Oklahoma: Census data for your State Plan
656,264 of 3,906,785 civilian noninstitutionalized residents of Oklahoma report a disability, 16.8%. 2019–2023 ACS 5-year estimates.
The state in numbers
- 3,906,785Civilian noninstitutionalized population
- 656,264With a disability16.8%
- 54,983Under 18 with a disability5.7% of that age group
- 348,33418 to 64 with a disability15.0% of that age group
- 252,94765 and over with a disability40.6% of that age group
- 669Consumers served by centers, 202310.2 per 10,000 people with a disability
Counties
Population and people with a disability for each of Oklahoma's 77 counties, with the disability count by age band. Each estimate has a margin of error that is wide for small counties; the Census Bureau publishes the margins with the table.
| County | Population | With a disability | Disability rate | Under 18 | 18 to 64 | 65 and over |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adair County | 19,342 | 4,292 | 22.2% | 231 | 2,498 | 1,563 |
| Alfalfa County | 4,512 | 797 | 17.7% | 71 | 387 | 339 |
| Atoka County | 12,905 | 2,928 | 22.7% | 160 | 1,514 | 1,254 |
| Beaver County | 4,950 | 798 | 16.1% | 53 | 282 | 463 |
| Beckham County | 18,871 | 2,779 | 14.7% | 190 | 1,568 | 1,021 |
| Blaine County | 7,646 | 1,256 | 16.4% | 239 | 489 | 528 |
| Bryan County | 46,644 | 9,344 | 20.0% | 747 | 4,851 | 3,746 |
| Caddo County | 25,252 | 4,886 | 19.3% | 338 | 2,600 | 1,948 |
| Canadian County | 160,080 | 22,505 | 14.1% | 2,016 | 12,347 | 8,142 |
| Carter County | 47,571 | 10,675 | 22.4% | 1,089 | 5,772 | 3,814 |
| Cherokee County | 47,145 | 9,722 | 20.6% | 683 | 5,306 | 3,733 |
| Choctaw County | 14,113 | 3,666 | 26.0% | 273 | 1,829 | 1,564 |
| Cimarron County | 2,230 | 640 | 28.7% | 16 | 285 | 339 |
| Cleveland County | 290,660 | 43,184 | 14.9% | 3,519 | 23,090 | 16,575 |
| Coal County | 5,218 | 1,280 | 24.5% | 89 | 674 | 517 |
| Comanche County | 107,627 | 22,915 | 21.3% | 2,068 | 13,603 | 7,244 |
| Cotton County | 5,371 | 1,394 | 26.0% | 130 | 810 | 454 |
| Craig County | 13,359 | 3,008 | 22.5% | 195 | 1,726 | 1,087 |
| Creek County | 71,520 | 10,905 | 15.2% | 776 | 5,508 | 4,621 |
| Custer County | 27,792 | 3,462 | 12.5% | 284 | 1,725 | 1,453 |
| Delaware County | 40,606 | 8,870 | 21.8% | 665 | 4,473 | 3,732 |
| Dewey County | 4,347 | 808 | 18.6% | 98 | 409 | 301 |
| Ellis County | 3,655 | 737 | 20.2% | 64 | 387 | 286 |
| Garfield County | 59,868 | 10,979 | 18.3% | 993 | 6,306 | 3,680 |
| Garvin County | 25,548 | 4,085 | 16.0% | 374 | 2,134 | 1,577 |
| Grady County | 55,346 | 10,449 | 18.9% | 747 | 5,355 | 4,347 |
| Grant County | 4,059 | 798 | 19.7% | 104 | 309 | 385 |
| Greer County | 4,528 | 869 | 19.2% | 33 | 447 | 389 |
| Harmon County | 2,376 | 487 | 20.5% | 68 | 217 | 202 |
| Harper County | 3,176 | 532 | 16.8% | 21 | 249 | 262 |
| Haskell County | 11,594 | 2,446 | 21.1% | 163 | 1,247 | 1,036 |
| Hughes County | 11,874 | 2,403 | 20.2% | 137 | 1,322 | 944 |
| Jackson County | 23,255 | 3,668 | 15.8% | 183 | 1,793 | 1,692 |
| Jefferson County | 5,244 | 1,444 | 27.5% | 153 | 603 | 688 |
| Johnston County | 10,262 | 2,553 | 24.9% | 210 | 1,290 | 1,053 |
| Kay County | 42,794 | 8,045 | 18.8% | 677 | 4,351 | 3,017 |
| Kingfisher County | 15,058 | 1,796 | 11.9% | 124 | 873 | 799 |
| Kiowa County | 8,284 | 1,867 | 22.5% | 63 | 946 | 858 |
| Latimer County | 9,309 | 2,071 | 22.2% | 120 | 1,015 | 936 |
| Le Flore County | 47,323 | 9,934 | 21.0% | 857 | 5,258 | 3,819 |
| Lincoln County | 33,482 | 6,841 | 20.4% | 548 | 3,296 | 2,997 |
| Logan County | 50,435 | 8,011 | 15.9% | 334 | 4,272 | 3,405 |
| Love County | 10,105 | 2,241 | 22.2% | 164 | 1,276 | 801 |
| Major County | 7,554 | 1,350 | 17.9% | 101 | 588 | 661 |
| Marshall County | 15,486 | 3,456 | 22.3% | 235 | 1,707 | 1,514 |
| Mayes County | 39,092 | 9,439 | 24.1% | 973 | 4,743 | 3,723 |
| McClain County | 43,342 | 6,277 | 14.5% | 372 | 3,271 | 2,634 |
| McCurtain County | 30,526 | 6,793 | 22.3% | 548 | 3,368 | 2,877 |
| McIntosh County | 18,955 | 4,819 | 25.4% | 144 | 2,453 | 2,222 |
| Murray County | 13,341 | 2,906 | 21.8% | 187 | 1,708 | 1,011 |
| Muskogee County | 63,495 | 15,137 | 23.8% | 1,421 | 8,376 | 5,340 |
| Noble County | 10,688 | 1,930 | 18.1% | 121 | 878 | 931 |
| Nowata County | 9,296 | 1,882 | 20.2% | 74 | 915 | 893 |
| Okfuskee County | 10,255 | 2,120 | 20.7% | 89 | 1,223 | 808 |
| Oklahoma County | 787,622 | 111,656 | 14.2% | 10,884 | 60,561 | 40,211 |
| Okmulgee County | 36,243 | 7,711 | 21.3% | 565 | 3,925 | 3,221 |
| Osage County | 44,385 | 9,151 | 20.6% | 631 | 4,754 | 3,766 |
| Ottawa County | 29,947 | 6,396 | 21.4% | 524 | 3,564 | 2,308 |
| Pawnee County | 15,502 | 2,825 | 18.2% | 178 | 1,394 | 1,253 |
| Payne County | 80,862 | 10,664 | 13.2% | 749 | 5,985 | 3,930 |
| Pittsburg County | 41,642 | 9,497 | 22.8% | 832 | 4,494 | 4,171 |
| Pontotoc County | 37,528 | 5,469 | 14.6% | 387 | 2,831 | 2,251 |
| Pottawatomie County | 70,908 | 13,800 | 19.5% | 917 | 7,543 | 5,340 |
| Pushmataha County | 10,667 | 3,085 | 28.9% | 271 | 1,407 | 1,407 |
| Roger Mills County | 3,364 | 662 | 19.7% | 34 | 303 | 325 |
| Rogers County | 96,085 | 16,170 | 16.8% | 1,235 | 8,590 | 6,345 |
| Seminole County | 23,073 | 5,563 | 24.1% | 348 | 3,045 | 2,170 |
| Sequoyah County | 39,201 | 9,549 | 24.4% | 761 | 4,946 | 3,842 |
| Stephens County | 42,720 | 8,895 | 20.8% | 567 | 4,264 | 4,064 |
| Texas County | 20,773 | 2,410 | 11.6% | 234 | 1,278 | 898 |
| Tillman County | 6,763 | 1,750 | 25.9% | 135 | 862 | 753 |
| Tulsa County | 667,647 | 91,013 | 13.6% | 8,395 | 49,095 | 33,523 |
| Wagoner County | 84,029 | 15,006 | 17.9% | 1,387 | 7,511 | 6,108 |
| Washington County | 52,352 | 9,414 | 18.0% | 931 | 4,669 | 3,814 |
| Washita County | 10,611 | 2,412 | 22.7% | 159 | 1,264 | 989 |
| Woods County | 8,100 | 1,357 | 16.8% | 72 | 639 | 646 |
| Woodward County | 19,395 | 3,330 | 17.2% | 455 | 1,488 | 1,387 |
Draft indicator language
Illustrations, not recommendations
These sentences show what an indicator looks like when the Census denominator is written into it, with Oklahoma's numbers filled in. The council, the designated state entity and the centers decide the targets. The plan's own definition of served, unserved and underserved governs; nothing here replaces it.
- Statewide reach. "By the end of the plan period, the Independent Living network will serve at least 2,947 consumers statewide, 44.9 per 10,000 of the 656,264 civilian noninstitutionalized residents with a disability (2019–2023 ACS 5-year estimates), the national median rate in report year 2023." The 2023 baseline is 669 consumers, 10.2 per 10,000.
- Reach in the largest county. "Centers will serve at least 501 consumers who live in Oklahoma County, 44.9 per 10,000 of its 111,656 residents with a disability, and will report the county figure each quarter."
- Presence in the smallest county. "At least one center will record consumers served in Harmon County (487 residents with a disability) in every quarter of the plan period, and the network will report reach per 10,000 for that county annually, noting the estimate's margin of error."
- Working-age reach. "Of consumers served, at least the share corresponding to the state's age mix will be aged 18 to 64. In Oklahoma, 348,334 of 656,264 people with a disability (53%) are of working age."
- Youth transition. "The network will serve at least N young people aged 14 to 24 each year, against a base of 54,983 children under 18 with a disability in the state (the Census band does not match 14 to 24 exactly; the plan should say so)."
- Improvement on baseline. "The network will increase consumers served by 10% over the 2023 baseline, from 669 to 736, and will publish reach per 10,000 by county each year so the increase can be seen where it happens."
Each of these needs the same twelve-month window and the same definition of a consumer at every center. Without that, the numerator cannot be trusted, and no denominator fixes it. The common definitions are the place to start.
Read before using
- The Census denominator excludes people in institutions. A network that moves people out of nursing homes is serving people the denominator does not count. Say so wherever reach is reported.
- Consumers served is an upper bound. The public center reports have no consumer identifier, so a person served by two centers is counted twice.
- The 2023 center figures are the latest public year. Report year 2023 covers 30 September 2023 to 29 September 2024.
- County reach is blank in the public data. It needs each center's county table, requested directly.
How penetration rates and thresholds work, and the county table as a CSV.