Spa Area Independent Living Services, Inc.

What the center reported

647Consumers served291 carried over, 356 new
434Information and referral contacts
$367,492Total income
$123,452Part B
$220,379Part C
781Goals achievedof 1,133 set
3Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$123,452
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$220,379
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$23,661
Total income	$367,492

Eight years of reports

Spa Area Independent Living Services, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	82	$294,282	$66,290	$169,009	8
2017	290	$448,719	$112,747	$169,009	15
2018	895	$593,321	$114,230	$190,592	17
2019	160	$637,499	$113,340	$195,989	0
2020	151	$482,178	$131,261	$195,989	1
2021	217	$453,601	$106,815	$195,989	22
2022	502	$483,307	$121,720	$200,306	9
2023	647	$367,492	$123,452	$220,379	3

Consumers served, by year

201682
2017290
2018895
2019160
2020151
2021217
2022502
2023647

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$568	98th	96th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$471	97th	94th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	68.9%	75th	70th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	0.0%	3th	4th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.46	36th	31th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.36	51th	62th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	97.4%	40th	39th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	89th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	96.0%	80th	50th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 7.2 of 7.5 FTE.
Equity index	7.9	92th	95th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	22.0%	42th	43th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 93.6% of income; Part B varied by 16.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (434) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	325	325	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	296	296	100.0%
Other services	193	193	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	122	88	72.1%
Youth transition	119	119	100.0%
Peer counseling	90	90	100.0%
Transportation	89	89	100.0%
Recreational services	63	63	100.0%
Communication services	41	41	100.0%
Vocational services	27	27	100.0%
Preventive services	16	16	100.0%
Assistive technology	14	14	100.0%
Mobility training	6	6	100.0%
Personal assistance	4	1	25.0%
Counseling and related services	3	3	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	1	1	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,410	1,373	97.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Housing and home modifications: 88 of 122 requests filled (72.1%).
Advocacy and legal services: 296 of 296 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 14 of 14 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 41 of 41 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 325 of 325 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 90 of 90 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	159	123	36
Communication	16	11	5
Mobility and transportation	90	69	21
Community-based living	218	95	123
Educational	39	3	36
Vocational	48	26	22
Self-care	421	382	39
Information access and technology	11	5	6
Personal resource management	20	5	15
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	3	3	0
Community and social participation	21	6	15
Other	87	53	34

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	3
5 to 19	11
20 to 24	25
25 to 59	445
60 and older	157
Age unavailable	6

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	16
Mental or emotional	390
Physical	109
Hearing	9
Vision	5
Multiple disabilities	42
Other	76

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Arkansas residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 51 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	430	72.1%	73.2%	0.99
Black or African American	123	20.6%	14.8%	1.39
American Indian or Alaska Native	5	0.8%	0.6%	1.31
Asian	1	0.2%	0.7%	0.25
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	12	2.0%	0.2%	12.67
Two or more races	5	0.8%	6.3%	0.13
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	20	3.4%	4.2%	0.80

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.