Independent Living Resource Center, Inc.

What the center reported

276Consumers served88 carried over, 188 new
4,575Information and referral contacts
$207,388Total income
$0Part B
$178,032Part C
243Goals achievedof 393 set
17Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$178,032
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$29,356
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$0
Total income	$207,388

Eight years of reports

Independent Living Resource Center, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	217	$163,870	$0	$139,832	0
2017	220	$150,285	$0	$139,880	0
2018	159	$161,032	$0	$157,525	2
2019	151	$191,738	$0	$162,256	0
2020	150	$239,627	$0	$162,256	0
2021	159	$229,887	$0	$161,968	2
2022	180	$227,710	$0	$163,883	8
2023	276	$207,388	$0	$178,032	17

Consumers served, by year

2016217
2017220
2018159
2019151
2020150
2021159
2022180
2023276

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$751	96th	90th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$853	93th	84th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	61.8%	65th	60th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	78.1%	66th	62th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	6.16	85th	80th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	9.55	81th	84th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	77th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	75.0%	57th	43th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	76th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 7.0 of 7.0 FTE.
Equity index	32.8	28th	34th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	16.6%	62th	60th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 85.8% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (4,575) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	134	134	100.0%
Assistive technology	107	107	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	76	76	100.0%
Youth transition	33	33	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	31	31	100.0%
Mobility training	16	16	100.0%
Communication services	15	15	100.0%
Personal assistance	11	11	100.0%
Transportation	8	8	100.0%
Preventive services	7	7	100.0%
Other services	7	7	100.0%
Peer counseling	5	5	100.0%
Vocational services	3	3	100.0%
Counseling and related services	2	2	100.0%
Family services	2	2	100.0%
Mental restoration	2	2	100.0%
Recreational services	1	1	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	1	1	100.0%
All services	461	461	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 31 of 31 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 107 of 107 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 15 of 15 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 76 of 76 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 134 of 134 requests filled (100.0%).
Mobility training: 16 of 16 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	5	2	2
Communication	4	3	1
Mobility and transportation	31	20	8
Community-based living	101	43	49
Educational	2	1	1
Self-care	18	13	3
Information access and technology	108	88	15
Personal resource management	45	33	9
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	25	17	4
Community and social participation	14	4	10
Other	40	19	20

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	4
5 to 19	1
20 to 24	9
25 to 59	84
60 and older	178
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	9
Mental or emotional	31
Physical	112
Hearing	2
Vision	77
Multiple disabilities	40
Other	5

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 18 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	193	74.8%	42.3%	1.77
Black or African American	6	2.3%	6.4%	0.37
American Indian or Alaska Native	4	1.6%	1.2%	1.29
Asian	1	0.4%	10.2%	0.04
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.4%	0.00
Two or more races	4	1.6%	11.9%	0.13
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	50	19.4%	27.6%	0.70

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.