Multiple Choices Center for Independent Living

What the center reported

98Consumers served48 carried over, 50 new
439Information and referral contacts
$470,234Total income
$204,359Part B
$184,166Part C
128Goals achievedof 226 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$204,359
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$184,166
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$74,000
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$7,709
Total income	$470,234

Eight years of reports

Multiple Choices Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	128	$355,981	$122,590	$136,762	0
2017	137	$342,554	$122,590	$137,191	0
2018	137	$382,931	$0	$155,523	0
2019	158	$561,259	$160,868	$96,453	2
2020	92	$381,570	$0	$160,868	2
2021	96	$320,007	$69,411	$161,116	0
2022	56	$346,698	$114,661	$166,081	0
2023	98	$470,234	$204,359	$184,166	1

Consumers served, by year

2016128
2017137
2018137
2019158
202092
202196
202256
202398

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$4,798	28th	12th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$3,674	66th	48th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	56.6%	57th	55th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	0.0%	3th	4th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.02	55th	54th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.54	34th	43th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	98.6%	45th	44th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	56.0%	9th	3th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	80.0%	54th	30th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 5.1 of 6.4 FTE.
Equity index	11.4	83th	86th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	19.2%	52th	48th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 82.6% of income; Part B varied by 68.3% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (439) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	85	85	100.0%
Other services	42	41	97.6%
Transportation	39	39	100.0%
Assistive technology	26	26	100.0%
IL skills training	16	14	87.5%
Recreational services	16	16	100.0%
Youth transition	16	16	100.0%
Communication services	12	12	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	11	10	90.9%
Preventive services	11	11	100.0%
Vocational services	4	4	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	1	1	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
All services	280	276	98.6%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

IL skills training: 14 of 16 requests filled (87.5%).
Housing and home modifications: 10 of 11 requests filled (90.9%).
Other services: 41 of 42 requests filled (97.6%).
Assistive technology: 26 of 26 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 12 of 12 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 85 of 85 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	25	12	13
Communication	4	2	2
Mobility and transportation	54	44	9
Community-based living	19	7	12
Educational	14	9	5
Vocational	9	0	9
Self-care	26	12	13
Information access and technology	33	20	13
Personal resource management	5	1	4
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	6	1	5
Community and social participation	25	19	5
Other	6	1	5

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	2
20 to 24	6
25 to 59	55
60 and older	35
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	8
Mental or emotional	17
Physical	37
Hearing	2
Vision	28
Multiple disabilities	5
Other	1

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Georgia residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	51	52.0%	54.4%	0.96
Black or African American	42	42.9%	31.5%	1.36
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.3%	0.00
Asian	1	1.0%	2.2%	0.47
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	1	1.0%	5.5%	0.19
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	3	3.1%	6.1%	0.50

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.