Aloha Independent Living Hawaii

What the center reported

199Consumers served134 carried over, 65 new
555Information and referral contacts
$838,742Total income
$185,580Part B
$492,749Part C
193Goals achievedof 354 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$185,580
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$492,749
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$160,413
Total income	$838,742

Eight years of reports

Aloha Independent Living Hawaii by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	304	$918,669	$237,000	$377,892	0
2017	249	$639,956	$0	$377,892	2
2018	247	$736,705	$0	$426,151	0
2019	241	$741,218	$0	$438,216	4
2020	293	$701,410	$0	$438,216	5
2021	164	$608,468	$0	$438,216	0
2022	287	$541,660	$0	$398,568	3
2023	199	$838,742	$185,580	$492,749	0

Consumers served, by year

2016304
2017249
2018247
2019241
2020293
2021164
2022287
2023199

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$4,215	34th	24th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$4,346	59th	55th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	54.5%	54th	62th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	70.8%	54th	55th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	10th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	10th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	52.8%	4th	4th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	39th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	75.0%	45th	39th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 6.0 of 8.0 FTE.
Equity index	33.4	27th	27th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	16.0%	66th	63th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 80.9% of income; Part B varied by 174.9% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (555) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	59	43	72.9%
Housing and home modifications	57	26	45.6%
Transportation	56	43	76.8%
Advocacy and legal services	48	19	39.6%
Recreational services	31	14	45.2%
IL skills training	30	12	40.0%
Personal assistance	22	3	13.6%
Assistive technology	19	12	63.2%
Mobility training	10	8	80.0%
Vocational services	9	1	11.1%
Physical restoration	6	2	33.3%
Rehabilitation technology	5	2	40.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	2	2	100.0%
Other services	2	1	50.0%
Children's services	1	0	0.0%
Youth transition	1	1	100.0%
All services	358	189	52.8%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Personal assistance: 3 of 22 requests filled (13.6%).
Advocacy and legal services: 19 of 48 requests filled (39.6%).
IL skills training: 12 of 30 requests filled (40.0%).
Recreational services: 14 of 31 requests filled (45.2%).
Housing and home modifications: 26 of 57 requests filled (45.6%).
Assistive technology: 12 of 19 requests filled (63.2%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	78	47	27
Mobility and transportation	60	48	7
Community-based living	49	22	12
Educational	4	2	1
Vocational	5	0	1
Self-care	43	20	17
Information access and technology	27	23	3
Personal resource management	28	13	11
Community and social participation	59	17	36
Other	1	1	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	3
5 to 19	4
20 to 24	4
25 to 59	89
60 and older	99
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	17
Mental or emotional	28
Physical	83
Hearing	3
Vision	34
Multiple disabilities	34
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Hawaii residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 4 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	83	42.6%	22.6%	1.88
Black or African American	2	1.0%	1.7%	0.60
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.4%	0.00
Asian	28	14.4%	38.1%	0.38
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	47	24.1%	10.6%	2.27
Two or more races	23	11.8%	19.4%	0.61
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	12	6.2%	7.2%	0.86

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.