What the center reported

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
SourceAmount
Title VII Part B (through the state)$82,986
Title VII Part C (direct federal)$232,046
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)$0
Other federal funds$0
State government funds$93,769
Local government funds$0
Private and other$4,373,784
Total income$4,782,585

Eight years of reports

Living Independence Network Corporation by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report yearConsumers servedTotal incomePart BPart CMoved out of institutions
2016932$3,933,121$0$177,9580
20171,195$4,780,951$0$177,9580
20181,381$4,859,629$0$200,6841
20191,464$4,521,810$0$206,3669
20201,459$5,017,427$72,824$206,3661
2021946$3,736,941$71,469$206,3661
2022746$5,592,313$77,905$210,9110
2023745$4,782,585$82,986$232,0460

Consumers served, by year

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
MeasureValueNational percentileSize-peer percentileWhat it is
Income per consumer$6,42020th50thTotal income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved$10,60430th54thTotal income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate57.5%58th56thGoals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met50.3%38th43thShare of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers0.0011th9thRelocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C0.0011th9thThe same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate91.4%29th35thConsumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities63.0%27th29thThe regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities57.0%15th24thShare of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 13.0 of 23.0 FTE.
Equity index7.494th90thIndex of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility11.9%82th85thCoefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags054th54thFailed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 6.6% of income; Part B varied by 100.4% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,781) and is not in this table.
ServiceRequestedReceivedFill rate
Transportation46946799.6%
Personal assistance20617384.0%
Vocational services614370.5%
Advocacy and legal services302273.3%
Youth transition232191.3%
Assistive technology201680.0%
IL skills training201785.0%
Housing and home modifications161275.0%
Peer counseling1313100.0%
Communication services1010100.0%
Mobility training100.0%
All services86979491.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal categorySetAchievedIn progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment261016
Communication321
Mobility and transportation468214252
Community-based living21417340
Educational541
Vocational503415
Self-care980
Information access and technology101
Personal resource management202
Community and social participation550
Other110

Who the center served

Consumers by age
AgeConsumers
Under 51
5 to 1918
20 to 2421
25 to 59269
60 and older436
Age unavailable0
Consumers by disability type
DisabilityConsumers
Cognitive61
Mental or emotional155
Physical232
Hearing7
Vision44
Multiple disabilities57
Other189

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Idaho residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 202 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
GroupConsumersShare of consumersShare of state disability populationRatio
White45483.6%80.4%1.04
Black or African American213.9%0.5%8.24
American Indian or Alaska Native50.9%1.4%0.66
Asian50.9%0.9%0.99
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander10.2%0.2%1.09
Two or more races20.4%7.3%0.05
Hispanic or Latino (any race)5510.1%9.3%1.08

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.