League for the Blind & Disabled, INC.

What the center reported

649Consumers served331 carried over, 318 new
9,525Information and referral contacts
$3,445,572Total income
$27,168Part B
$386,475Part C
1,162Goals achievedof 1,593 set
9Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$27,168
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$386,475
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$158,753
Other federal funds	$154,072
State government funds	$160,993
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$2,558,112
Total income	$3,445,572

Eight years of reports

League for the Blind & Disabled, INC. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	716	$2,487,741	$33,293	$297,525	26
2017	656	$2,505,619	$239,086	$296,045	30
2018	654	$2,348,702	$35,861	$333,167	22
2019	603	$3,063,070	$24,339	$342,420	22
2020	644	$2,193,870	$25,194	$342,420	35
2021	475	$3,212,794	$26,348	$341,812	14
2022	605	$2,743,472	$27,145	$348,803	64
2023	649	$3,445,572	$27,168	$386,475	9

Consumers served, by year

2016716
2017656
2018654
2019603
2020644
2021475
2022605
2023649

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$5,309	24th	57th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,965	70th	95th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	72.9%	79th	82th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	42.3%	32th	37th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.39	63th	68th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.33	59th	49th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	86.0%	20th	24th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	71.0%	48th	59th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 10 of 14 members.
Staff with disabilities	62.0%	23th	42th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 29.0 of 47.0 FTE.
Equity index	8.7	91th	85th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	15.2%	70th	70th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 16.6% of income; Part B varied by 127.3% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (9,525) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	238	216	90.8%
Assistive technology	218	151	69.3%
Other services	185	112	60.5%
Communication services	164	162	98.8%
Housing and home modifications	156	152	97.4%
Preventive services	155	135	87.1%
Children's services	154	154	100.0%
Peer counseling	123	103	83.7%
IL skills training	122	104	85.2%
Personal assistance	63	62	98.4%
Vocational services	42	41	97.6%
Mobility training	31	20	64.5%
Recreational services	29	26	89.7%
Transportation	19	17	89.5%
Family services	10	9	90.0%
Mental restoration	10	10	100.0%
Counseling and related services	9	9	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	8	8	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	6	6	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	3	3	100.0%
Youth transition	3	3	100.0%
All services	1,748	1,503	86.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Other services: 112 of 185 requests filled (60.5%).
Mobility training: 20 of 31 requests filled (64.5%).
Assistive technology: 151 of 218 requests filled (69.3%).
Peer counseling: 103 of 123 requests filled (83.7%).
IL skills training: 104 of 122 requests filled (85.2%).
Preventive services: 135 of 155 requests filled (87.1%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	108	83	21
Communication	89	71	16
Mobility and transportation	94	62	29
Community-based living	155	92	56
Educational	145	102	34
Vocational	80	60	17
Self-care	163	114	43
Information access and technology	254	182	67
Personal resource management	271	225	35
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	23	9	13
Community and social participation	180	143	30
Other	31	19	8

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	6
5 to 19	143
20 to 24	17
25 to 59	143
60 and older	340
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	52
Mental or emotional	68
Physical	79
Hearing	27
Vision	198
Multiple disabilities	201
Other	24

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Indiana residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 2 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	491	75.9%	78.5%	0.97
Black or African American	111	17.2%	9.2%	1.87
American Indian or Alaska Native	3	0.5%	0.3%	1.66
Asian	10	1.5%	1.1%	1.44
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	10	1.5%	5.5%	0.28
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	22	3.4%	5.5%	0.62

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.