Southeast Kansas Independent Living Resource Center, Inc.

What the center reported

2,873Consumers served2,341 carried over, 532 new
1,316Information and referral contacts
$22,015,848Total income
$24,644Part B
$87,571Part C
962Goals achievedof 2,804 set
16Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$24,644
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$87,571
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$80,716
State government funds	$211,624
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$21,611,293
Total income	$22,015,848

Eight years of reports

Southeast Kansas Independent Living Resource Center, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	4,414	$24,469,633	$16,207	$67,159	1
2017	4,346	$24,002,537	$0	$67,159	2
2018	3,806	$22,125,309	$24,980	$75,736	0
2019	3,567	$21,584,157	$25,875	$77,880	0
2020	3,782	$21,661,668	$28,875	$77,880	47
2021	2,842	$19,842,795	$24,644	$77,880	4
2022	2,592	$21,145,372	$24,644	$79,595	27
2023	2,873	$22,015,848	$24,644	$87,571	16

Consumers served, by year

20164,414
20174,346
20183,806
20193,567
20203,782
20212,842
20222,592
20232,873

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$7,663	16th	44th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$22,885	14th	28th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	34.3%	31th	32th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	3.0%	7th	8th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.56	41th	47th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	18.27	90th	87th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	97th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	85.0%	66th	87th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 51.0 of 60.0 FTE.
Equity index	10.8	86th	81th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	6.3%	98th	98th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 0.5% of income; Part B varied by 41.0% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,316) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	1,057	1,057	100.0%
Other services	675	675	100.0%
Personal assistance	475	475	100.0%
Assistive technology	330	330	100.0%
Youth transition	170	170	100.0%
Children's services	168	168	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	146	146	100.0%
Preventive services	64	64	100.0%
Counseling and related services	58	58	100.0%
Communication services	39	39	100.0%
Recreational services	39	39	100.0%
Transportation	38	38	100.0%
Peer counseling	28	28	100.0%
IL skills training	12	12	100.0%
Family services	10	10	100.0%
Vocational services	4	4	100.0%
Mobility training	3	3	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	3	3	100.0%
All services	3,319	3,319	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 1,057 of 1,057 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 330 of 330 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 168 of 168 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 39 of 39 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 58 of 58 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 10 of 10 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	248	129	92
Communication	210	14	190
Mobility and transportation	424	41	370
Community-based living	1,073	410	521
Educational	26	3	21
Vocational	16	1	14
Self-care	334	179	139
Information access and technology	192	7	178
Personal resource management	146	111	30
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	25	16	6
Community and social participation	40	29	9
Other	70	22	41

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	59
5 to 19	196
20 to 24	82
25 to 59	923
60 and older	1,613
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	153
Mental or emotional	18
Physical	689
Hearing	39
Vision	59
Multiple disabilities	1,883
Other	32

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Kansas residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 119 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	2,301	83.6%	75.6%	1.11
Black or African American	200	7.3%	5.8%	1.26
American Indian or Alaska Native	55	2.0%	0.9%	2.30
Asian	11	0.4%	1.4%	0.28
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	7	0.3%	0.0%	5.82
Two or more races	75	2.7%	7.3%	0.37
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	105	3.8%	9.0%	0.42

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.