Center for Living Independently in the CNMI

What the center reported

245Consumers served154 carried over, 91 new
1,705Information and referral contacts
$522,029Total income
$0Part B
$123,642Part C
136Goals achievedof 516 set
16Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$123,642
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$274,970
State government funds	$88,145
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$35,272
Total income	$522,029

Eight years of reports

Center for Living Independently in the CNMI by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	62	$129,549	$0	$95,139	0
2017	40	$146,729	$0	$95,139	0
2018	58	$234,637	$0	$107,289	0
2019	105	$309,206	$0	$110,326	0
2020	145	$306,106	$0	$110,326	0
2021	151	$526,569	$0	$110,326	0
2022	200	$462,605	$0	$112,367	8
2023	245	$522,029	$0	$123,642	16

Consumers served, by year

201662
201740
201858
2019105
2020145
2021151
2022200
2023245

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,131	65th	43th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$3,838	65th	46th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	26.4%	22th	25th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	17.6%	15th	13th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	6.53	86th	81th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	12.94	84th	86th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	90.6%	27th	28th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	71.0%	48th	32th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	57.0%	15th	4th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 4.0 of 7.0 FTE.
Equity index	—	—	—	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	45.1%	11th	12th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 23.7% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,705) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	179	137	76.5%
Other services	156	149	95.5%
Transportation	99	81	81.8%
IL skills training	92	78	84.8%
Communication services	76	67	88.2%
Peer counseling	66	64	97.0%
Recreational services	66	63	95.5%
Assistive technology	64	59	92.2%
Youth transition	61	60	98.4%
Mental restoration	58	58	100.0%
Counseling and related services	55	53	96.4%
Personal assistance	52	51	98.1%
Family services	51	51	100.0%
Mobility training	51	49	96.1%
Vocational services	50	49	98.0%
Physical restoration	47	47	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	14	6	42.9%
Preventive services	1	0	0.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,239	1,123	90.6%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Housing and home modifications: 6 of 14 requests filled (42.9%).
Advocacy and legal services: 137 of 179 requests filled (76.5%).
Transportation: 81 of 99 requests filled (81.8%).
IL skills training: 78 of 92 requests filled (84.8%).
Communication services: 67 of 76 requests filled (88.2%).
Assistive technology: 59 of 64 requests filled (92.2%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	51	6	45
Communication	15	2	13
Mobility and transportation	61	19	41
Community-based living	61	8	49
Educational	55	9	45
Vocational	22	5	17
Self-care	50	4	44
Information access and technology	2	0	2
Personal resource management	111	57	52
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	27	16	9
Community and social participation	18	1	17
Other	43	9	33

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	17
20 to 24	35
25 to 59	130
60 and older	63
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	39
Mental or emotional	46
Physical	80
Hearing	6
Vision	2
Multiple disabilities	65
Other	7

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

No race and ethnicity comparison is possible: either the center reported no race data or the Census does not cover this jurisdiction.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.