Living Independence for Everyone

What the center reported

1,639Consumers served1,457 carried over, 182 new
2,273Information and referral contacts
$1,204,815Total income
$0Part B
$1,094,997Part C
703Goals achievedof 1,966 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$1,094,997
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$70,773
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$39,045
Total income	$1,204,815

Eight years of reports

Living Independence for Everyone by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,670	$1,058,434	$0	$839,761	5
2017	1,413	$1,058,434	$0	$839,761	6
2018	1,525	$1,204,135	$0	$947,003	2
2019	1,684	$1,120,915	$0	$973,814	0
2020	1,857	$1,570,934	$0	$973,814	2
2021	1,717	$1,341,863	$0	$973,814	0
2022	1,716	$1,190,291	$0	$1,077,885	0
2023	1,639	$1,204,815	$0	$1,094,997	2

Consumers served, by year

20161,670
20171,413
20181,525
20191,684
20201,857
20211,717
20221,716
20231,639

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$735	96th	97th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,714	82th	80th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	35.8%	33th	28th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	22.5%	17th	18th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.12	24th	25th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.18	22th	22th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	99.7%	52th	49th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	90.0%	85th	83th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 9 of 10 members.
Staff with disabilities	78.0%	50th	61th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 14.0 of 18.0 FTE.
Equity index	35.6	22th	19th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	13.0%	78th	82th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	1	5th	8th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 90.9% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (2,273) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Communication services	811	811	100.0%
Peer counseling	665	665	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	347	347	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	148	145	98.0%
Youth transition	75	75	100.0%
IL skills training	67	67	100.0%
Recreational services	63	61	96.8%
Assistive technology	30	28	93.3%
Mobility training	24	24	100.0%
Preventive services	19	19	100.0%
Personal assistance	17	16	94.1%
Children's services	5	5	100.0%
Counseling and related services	5	5	100.0%
Family services	1	2	200.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	1	100.0%
All services	2,279	2,272	99.7%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Assistive technology: 28 of 30 requests filled (93.3%).
Personal assistance: 16 of 17 requests filled (94.1%).
Recreational services: 61 of 63 requests filled (96.8%).
Housing and home modifications: 145 of 148 requests filled (98.0%).
Advocacy and legal services: 347 of 347 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 811 of 811 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	6	6	0
Communication	572	500	72
Mobility and transportation	372	51	321
Community-based living	356	88	248
Educational	49	7	42
Vocational	17	7	10
Self-care	218	19	135
Information access and technology	129	9	96
Personal resource management	4	0	4
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	16	2	6
Community and social participation	66	10	38
Other	161	4	38

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	129
20 to 24	70
25 to 59	464
60 and older	974
Age unavailable	1

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	58
Mental or emotional	77
Physical	982
Hearing	12
Vision	28
Multiple disabilities	278
Other	204

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Mississippi residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 10 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	424	26.0%	57.5%	0.45
Black or African American	1,172	71.9%	36.3%	1.98
American Indian or Alaska Native	4	0.2%	0.4%	0.69
Asian	2	0.1%	0.5%	0.26
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	6	0.4%	3.2%	0.11
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	21	1.3%	2.1%	0.62

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

More received a service than requested it. For at least one service type, the count receiving exceeds the count requesting.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.