The Adaptables, Inc.

What the center reported

370Consumers served105 carried over, 265 new
4,173Information and referral contacts
$1,565,685Total income
$81,294Part B
$388,749Part C
199Goals achievedof 571 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$81,294
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$388,749
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$66,000
State government funds	$1,029,642
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$0
Total income	$1,565,685

Eight years of reports

The Adaptables, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	187	$351,087	$58,744	$290,994	3
2017	227	$326,110	$33,908	$291,417	3
2018	123	$371,420	$35,197	$330,686	3
2019	102	$444,654	$42,397	$400,757	0
2020	83	$778,145	$65,738	$342,369	0
2021	83	$711,512	$48,487	$343,862	0
2022	176	$623,925	$76,539	$355,170	11
2023	370	$1,565,685	$81,294	$388,749	1

Consumers served, by year

2016187
2017227
2018123
2019102
202083
202183
2022176
2023370

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$4,232	33th	24th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$7,868	38th	33th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	34.9%	31th	25th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	21.4%	17th	17th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.27	32th	35th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.26	24th	26th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	98.0%	42th	40th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	57.0%	14th	18th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	83.0%	62th	72th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.0 of 12.0 FTE.
Equity index	32.0	29th	28th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	59.2%	6th	6th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 30.0% of income; Part B varied by 30.8% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (4,173) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	229	227	99.1%
IL skills training	141	139	98.6%
Advocacy and legal services	71	70	98.6%
Housing and home modifications	49	49	100.0%
Other services	30	27	90.0%
Vocational services	5	5	100.0%
Personal assistance	4	4	100.0%
Communication services	2	2	100.0%
Youth transition	2	1	50.0%
Assistive technology	1	1	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
Preventive services	1	0	0.0%
Transportation	1	0	0.0%
All services	537	526	98.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Other services: 27 of 30 requests filled (90.0%).
Advocacy and legal services: 70 of 71 requests filled (98.6%).
IL skills training: 139 of 141 requests filled (98.6%).
Peer counseling: 227 of 229 requests filled (99.1%).
Housing and home modifications: 49 of 49 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	14	6	4
Communication	1	0	0
Mobility and transportation	31	15	13
Community-based living	261	85	130
Educational	32	6	23
Vocational	58	18	26
Self-care	13	5	6
Information access and technology	9	4	2
Personal resource management	31	15	14
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	5	1	3
Community and social participation	44	13	25
Other	72	31	35

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	2
5 to 19	25
20 to 24	17
25 to 59	226
60 and older	100
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	17
Mental or emotional	123
Physical	144
Hearing	2
Vision	4
Multiple disabilities	70
Other	10

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with North Carolina residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 21 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	145	41.5%	64.8%	0.64
Black or African American	187	53.6%	21.6%	2.48
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.3%	1.3%	0.22
Asian	2	0.6%	1.4%	0.41
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	2	0.6%	5.2%	0.11
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	12	3.4%	5.7%	0.61

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.