Society for Equal Access

What the center reported

541Consumers served262 carried over, 279 new
74Information and referral contacts
$418,502Total income
$119,622Part B
$232,680Part C
382Goals achievedof 593 set
11Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$119,622
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$232,680
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$66,200
Total income	$418,502

Eight years of reports

Society for Equal Access by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	169	$310,630	$101,069	$181,888	5
2017	146	$329,710	$98,694	$180,659	0
2018	269	$436,031	$98,694	$202,919	1
2019	296	$346,972	$98,694	$208,289	3
2020	263	$527,813	$98,694	$208,289	6
2021	335	$338,066	$98,694	$207,920	0
2022	515	$361,714	$98,694	$207,920	2
2023	541	$418,502	$119,622	$232,680	11

Consumers served, by year

2016169
2017146
2018269
2019296
2020263
2021335
2022515
2023541

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$774	94th	85th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,096	90th	81th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	64.4%	67th	63th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	93.3%	89th	87th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	2.03	69th	67th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	4.73	70th	77th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	77th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	57.0%	14th	7th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	76th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 5.0 of 5.0 FTE.
Equity index	16.9	67th	69th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	17.7%	59th	54th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 84.2% of income; Part B varied by 6.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (74) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	303	303	100.0%
Other services	181	181	100.0%
Assistive technology	90	90	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	77	77	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	63	63	100.0%
Communication services	62	62	100.0%
IL skills training	43	43	100.0%
Youth transition	12	12	100.0%
Personal assistance	11	11	100.0%
Counseling and related services	6	6	100.0%
Physical restoration	4	4	100.0%
Recreational services	3	3	100.0%
Transportation	3	3	100.0%
Mobility training	2	2	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	2	2	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	2	2	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
All services	867	867	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 63 of 63 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 90 of 90 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 62 of 62 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 77 of 77 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 43 of 43 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 303 of 303 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	51	30	21
Communication	4	3	1
Mobility and transportation	62	34	28
Community-based living	62	49	13
Educational	3	0	3
Vocational	1	0	1
Self-care	9	7	2
Information access and technology	5	2	3
Personal resource management	4	1	3
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	15	11	4
Community and social participation	264	190	74
Other	113	55	58

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	13
20 to 24	16
25 to 59	103
60 and older	404
Age unavailable	4

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	46
Mental or emotional	86
Physical	315
Hearing	21
Vision	36
Multiple disabilities	22
Other	15

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Ohio residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	506	93.5%	77.0%	1.21
Black or African American	25	4.6%	13.0%	0.36
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.2%	0.00
Asian	0	0.0%	1.1%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.4%	0.0%	10.94
Two or more races	8	1.5%	5.1%	0.29
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	0	0.0%	3.7%	0.00

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.