Ability Resources, Inc.

What the center reported

465Consumers served293 carried over, 172 new
2,204Information and referral contacts
$1,742,769Total income
$69,510Part B
$253,325Part C
1,129Goals achievedof 1,146 set
6Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$69,510
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$253,325
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$91,429
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$57,366
Private and other	$1,271,139
Total income	$1,742,769

Eight years of reports

Ability Resources, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	431	$1,450,239	$40,531	$194,277	0
2017	442	$1,187,466	$42,741	$194,277	1
2018	374	$1,277,620	$55,830	$219,087	1
2019	395	$1,146,422	$50,180	$225,290	22
2020	413	$1,204,401	$52,342	$225,290	0
2021	370	$1,363,749	$53,876	$225,290	16
2022	339	$1,492,611	$57,241	$230,252	22
2023	465	$1,742,769	$69,510	$253,325	6

Consumers served, by year

2016431
2017442
2018374
2019395
2020413
2021370
2022339
2023465

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,748	41th	33th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,544	84th	82th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	98.5%	99th	97th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	32.1%	24th	22th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.29	61th	65th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.37	60th	55th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	55.0%	6th	3th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	57.0%	15th	16th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 6.2 of 10.9 FTE.
Equity index	21.6	52th	44th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	13.7%	75th	79th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	1	5th	8th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 18.5% of income; Part B varied by 16.0% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (2,204) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	462	462	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	456	456	100.0%
Transportation	454	454	100.0%
Counseling and related services	450	450	100.0%
Assistive technology	449	449	100.0%
Physical restoration	448	448	100.0%
Preventive services	448	448	100.0%
Peer counseling	208	208	100.0%
Other services	166	166	100.0%
Personal assistance	131	131	100.0%
Family services	46	46	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	34	34	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	25	25	100.0%
Recreational services	17	17	100.0%
Communication services	12	12	100.0%
Mobility training	4	4	100.0%
Vocational services	4	4	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	2	2	100.0%
Youth transition	1	1	100.0%
All services	3,817	3,817	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 456 of 456 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 449 of 449 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 12 of 12 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 450 of 450 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 46 of 46 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 34 of 34 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	200	199	1
Communication	1	0	1
Mobility and transportation	2	1	1
Community-based living	1	0	0
Educational	1	0	1
Vocational	1	0	0
Self-care	452	452	0
Personal resource management	459	453	6
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	11	6	3
Community and social participation	17	17	0
Other	1	1	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	1
20 to 24	4
25 to 59	138
60 and older	322
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	8
Mental or emotional	0
Physical	213
Hearing	0
Vision	0
Multiple disabilities	227
Other	17

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Oklahoma residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 10 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	280	61.5%	67.8%	0.91
Black or African American	127	27.9%	6.6%	4.22
American Indian or Alaska Native	20	4.4%	7.2%	0.61
Asian	5	1.1%	1.1%	1.01
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.4%	0.1%	3.56
Two or more races	2	0.4%	10.3%	0.04
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	19	4.2%	6.8%	0.61

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

Goal achievement at or above 98%. With 20 or more goals set, nearly every goal was achieved, which can mean goals are recorded as set and achieved at the same time.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.