disAbility Resource Center (dba) AccessAbility

What the center reported

842Consumers served232 carried over, 610 new
7,109Information and referral contacts
$1,653,513Total income
$57,696Part B
$311,413Part C
5,169Goals achievedof 5,254 set
8Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$57,696
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$311,413
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$97,728
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$1,155,900
Local government funds	$3,000
Private and other	$27,776
Total income	$1,653,513

Eight years of reports

disAbility Resource Center (dba) AccessAbility by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	582	$439,478	$0	$230,269	0
2017	478	$470,639	$0	$231,342	14
2018	636	$511,511	$77,154	$263,274	90
2019	1,066	$1,296,912	$51,139	$272,648	5
2020	598	$1,187,560	$57,662	$272,648	5
2021	734	$1,419,100	$57,695	$274,870	4
2022	908	$1,558,321	$57,695	$284,672	9
2023	842	$1,653,513	$57,696	$311,413	8

Consumers served, by year

2016582
2017478
2018636
20191,066
2020598
2021734
2022908
2023842

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,964	71th	75th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$320	99th	98th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	98.4%	98th	96th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	0.0%	3th	2th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.95	54th	57th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.57	61th	58th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	98.6%	45th	43th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	93th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	88.0%	71th	86th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 7.5 of 8.5 FTE.
Equity index	26.9	38th	37th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	44.9%	11th	10th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	1	5th	8th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 28.2% of income; Part B varied by 59.8% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (7,109) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Personal assistance	3,712	3,704	99.8%
Peer counseling	2,422	2,383	98.4%
IL skills training	2,418	2,377	98.3%
Communication services	2,170	2,133	98.3%
Youth transition	2,117	2,076	98.1%
Advocacy and legal services	1,772	1,766	99.7%
Vocational services	1,477	1,439	97.4%
Assistive technology	1,457	1,423	97.7%
Preventive services	414	412	99.5%
Other services	159	158	99.4%
Recreational services	75	75	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	10	10	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	5	4	80.0%
Transportation	3	3	100.0%
Children's services	2	2	100.0%
Family services	2	2	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	2	2	100.0%
Counseling and related services	1	1	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	1	0	0.0%
All services	18,219	17,970	98.6%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Vocational services: 1,439 of 1,477 requests filled (97.4%).
Assistive technology: 1,423 of 1,457 requests filled (97.7%).
Youth transition: 2,076 of 2,117 requests filled (98.1%).
Communication services: 2,133 of 2,170 requests filled (98.3%).
IL skills training: 2,377 of 2,418 requests filled (98.3%).
Peer counseling: 2,383 of 2,422 requests filled (98.4%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	417	414	1
Communication	608	586	9
Mobility and transportation	221	221	0
Community-based living	812	804	8
Educational	594	584	9
Vocational	528	520	8
Self-care	296	294	0
Information access and technology	471	461	10
Personal resource management	501	490	10
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	8	8	0
Community and social participation	798	787	9

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	532
20 to 24	66
25 to 59	69
60 and older	175
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	293
Mental or emotional	140
Physical	165
Hearing	3
Vision	21
Multiple disabilities	128
Other	92

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with South Carolina residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 1 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	326	38.8%	64.1%	0.60
Black or African American	392	46.6%	25.9%	1.80
American Indian or Alaska Native	3	0.4%	0.4%	0.89
Asian	13	1.5%	1.0%	1.60
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.1%	0.0%	2.64
Two or more races	25	3.0%	4.5%	0.66
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	81	9.6%	4.1%	2.35

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

Goal achievement at or above 98%. With 20 or more goals set, nearly every goal was achieved, which can mean goals are recorded as set and achieved at the same time.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.