What the center reported

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
SourceAmount
Title VII Part B (through the state)$86,812
Title VII Part C (direct federal)$285,972
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)$0
Other federal funds$0
State government funds$244,213
Local government funds$0
Private and other$11,714
Total income$628,712

Eight years of reports

Western Resources for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report yearConsumers servedTotal incomePart BPart CMoved out of institutions
2016548$1,476,259$56,533$214,2472
2017529$494,876$125,389$258,9980
2018511$392,435$121,942$247,3220
2019473$358,364$79,802$254,3241
2020473$330,482$62,702$254,3242
2021469$431,433$140,430$254,3242
2022484$524,914$122,662$259,9252
2023477$628,712$86,812$285,9721

Consumers served, by year

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
MeasureValueNational percentileSize-peer percentileWhat it is
Income per consumer$1,31885th87thTotal income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved$2,46675th72thTotal income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate47.3%46th56thGoals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met57.3%42th43thShare of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers0.2129th26thRelocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C0.3528th26thThe same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate99.6%52th53thConsumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities100.0%93th95thThe regulation requires more than 50%. 3 of 3 members.
Staff with disabilities100.0%90th89thShare of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 6.0 of 6.0 FTE.
Equity index9.190th97thIndex of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility60.5%6th5thCoefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags054th53thFailed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 59.3% of income; Part B varied by 30.0% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,537) and is not in this table.
ServiceRequestedReceivedFill rate
Advocacy and legal services364364100.0%
Other services187187100.0%
Peer counseling124124100.0%
Housing and home modifications11811799.2%
Communication services113113100.0%
Preventive services8585100.0%
IL skills training5454100.0%
Assistive technology363597.2%
Youth transition8787.5%
Transportation22100.0%
Vocational services2150.0%
All services1,0931,08999.6%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal categorySetAchievedIn progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment1296428
Communication110
Information access and technology110
Personal resource management622
Relocation from a nursing home or institution110
Other401186126

Who the center served

Consumers by age
AgeConsumers
Under 52
5 to 1928
20 to 2442
25 to 59208
60 and older197
Age unavailable0
Consumers by disability type
DisabilityConsumers
Cognitive37
Mental or emotional76
Physical234
Hearing2
Vision6
Multiple disabilities117
Other5

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with South Dakota residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 1 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
GroupConsumersShare of consumersShare of state disability populationRatio
White37077.7%81.9%0.95
Black or African American91.9%1.1%1.74
American Indian or Alaska Native7616.0%7.8%2.04
Asian30.6%0.8%0.77
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander10.2%0.1%2.34
Two or more races81.7%4.8%0.35
Hispanic or Latino (any race)91.9%3.5%0.55

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.