Valley Associates for Independent Living, Inc

What the center reported

483Consumers served396 carried over, 87 new
629Information and referral contacts
$1,273,900Total income
$26,000Part B
$116,525Part C
535Goals achievedof 639 set
3Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$26,000
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$116,525
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$169,774
State government funds	$317,700
Local government funds	$12,600
Private and other	$631,301
Total income	$1,273,900

Eight years of reports

Valley Associates for Independent Living, Inc by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	564	$736,444	$21,117	$89,166	4
2017	512	$755,835	$23,500	$89,018	3
2018	527	$786,068	$25,642	$100,322	1
2019	545	$818,618	$25,642	$103,296	1
2020	446	$895,915	$23,833	$103,296	0
2021	429	$817,640	$26,000	$103,113	5
2022	468	$975,100	$26,000	$105,327	1
2023	483	$1,273,900	$26,000	$116,525	3

Consumers served, by year

2016564
2017512
2018527
2019545
2020446
2021429
2022468
2023483

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,637	55th	56th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,381	76th	71th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	83.7%	89th	86th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	41.9%	31th	30th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.62	45th	48th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.57	61th	58th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	90.0%	85th	83th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 9 of 10 members.
Staff with disabilities	83.0%	62th	72th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.0 of 12.0 FTE.
Equity index	17.8	63th	60th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	18.7%	55th	60th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 11.2% of income; Part B varied by 6.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (629) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Preventive services	407	407	100.0%
IL skills training	69	69	100.0%
Youth transition	55	55	100.0%
Peer counseling	23	23	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	19	19	100.0%
Recreational services	14	14	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	12	12	100.0%
Other services	11	11	100.0%
Transportation	1	1	100.0%
Vocational services	1	1	100.0%
All services	612	612	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 19 of 19 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 12 of 12 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 69 of 69 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 23 of 23 requests filled (100.0%).
Preventive services: 407 of 407 requests filled (100.0%).
Recreational services: 14 of 14 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	13	7	6
Communication	3	3	0
Mobility and transportation	7	5	2
Community-based living	154	123	31
Educational	4	2	2
Vocational	11	6	5
Self-care	308	278	30
Information access and technology	1	0	1
Personal resource management	104	94	10
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	7	3	4
Community and social participation	27	14	13

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	3
5 to 19	107
20 to 24	71
25 to 59	194
60 and older	108
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	230
Mental or emotional	25
Physical	217
Hearing	4
Vision	7
Multiple disabilities	0
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Virginia residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 2 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	388	80.7%	63.1%	1.28
Black or African American	35	7.3%	20.3%	0.36
American Indian or Alaska Native	3	0.6%	0.4%	1.75
Asian	7	1.5%	3.8%	0.39
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	20	4.2%	5.9%	0.70
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	28	5.8%	6.5%	0.90

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.