VI Association for Independent Living

What the center reported

174Consumers served159 carried over, 15 new
782Information and referral contacts
$375,179Total income
$0Part B
$256,202Part C
35Goals achievedof 235 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$256,202
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$97,500
Private and other	$21,477
Total income	$375,179

Eight years of reports

VI Association for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C
2016	377	$338,424	$0	$247,036
2017	387	$342,952	$0	$247,036
2018	406	$321,151	$0	$251,077
2019	333	$366,963	$0	$256,202
2020	248	$367,108	$0	$256,202
2021	263	$466,995	$0	$256,202
2022	166	$363,749	$0	$256,202
2023	174	$375,179	$0	$256,202

Consumers served, by year

2016377
2017387
2018406
2019333
2020248
2021263
2022166
2023174

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,156	64th	42th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$10,719	30th	16th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	14.9%	11th	10th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	0.0%	3th	4th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	14th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	14th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	77th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	57.0%	14th	7th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	76th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 4.0 of 4.0 FTE.
Equity index	—	—	—	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	11.2%	85th	83th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 68.3% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (782) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Other services	146	146	100.0%
IL skills training	124	124	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	69	69	100.0%
Vocational services	50	50	100.0%
Recreational services	27	27	100.0%
Transportation	26	26	100.0%
Peer counseling	15	15	100.0%
Assistive technology	14	14	100.0%
Mental restoration	11	11	100.0%
Communication services	9	9	100.0%
Preventive services	9	9	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	6	6	100.0%
Mobility training	3	3	100.0%
Counseling and related services	1	1	100.0%
Personal assistance	1	1	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	1	100.0%
Youth transition	1	1	100.0%
All services	513	513	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 69 of 69 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 14 of 14 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 124 of 124 requests filled (100.0%).
Mental restoration: 11 of 11 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 15 of 15 requests filled (100.0%).
Recreational services: 27 of 27 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	3	0	3
Communication	4	0	4
Mobility and transportation	28	0	27
Community-based living	7	1	4
Educational	28	0	23
Vocational	14	0	14
Self-care	93	21	8
Information access and technology	38	13	10
Personal resource management	6	0	6
Community and social participation	7	0	7
Other	7	0	6

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	5
20 to 24	8
25 to 59	89
60 and older	72
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	29
Mental or emotional	13
Physical	40
Hearing	18
Vision	71
Multiple disabilities	2
Other	1

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

No race and ethnicity comparison is possible: either the center reported no race data or the Census does not cover this jurisdiction.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.