Independent Living Resources, Inc.

What the center reported

332Consumers served132 carried over, 200 new
3,497Information and referral contacts
$1,272,643Total income
$25,726Part B
$35,300Part C
289Goals achievedof 469 set
8Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$25,726
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$35,300
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$54,792
State government funds	$391,752
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$765,072
Total income	$1,272,643

Eight years of reports

Independent Living Resources, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	656	$1,505,448	$25,470	$26,176	0
2017	670	$1,513,662	$29,941	$27,213	1
2018	637	$1,431,127	$35,563	$30,603	1
2019	414	$1,500,091	$45,077	$31,385	0
2020	333	$1,639,040	$54,578	$31,385	1
2021	400	$1,387,420	$47,152	$31,329	3
2022	453	$1,274,262	$26,283	$31,755	0
2023	332	$1,272,643	$25,726	$35,300	8

Consumers served, by year

2016656
2017670
2018637
2019414
2020333
2021400
2022453
2023332

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,833	39th	28th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$4,404	59th	53th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	61.6%	64th	62th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	85.2%	74th	67th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	2.41	72th	75th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	22.66	92th	88th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	78.0%	63th	62th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	95.0%	79th	94th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 20.0 of 21.0 FTE.
Equity index	10.4	86th	83th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	8.2%	94th	92th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 4.8% of income; Part B varied by 29.3% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (3,497) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	207	207	100.0%
Other services	115	115	100.0%
Youth transition	71	71	100.0%
IL skills training	49	49	100.0%
Peer counseling	36	36	100.0%
Assistive technology	29	29	100.0%
Transportation	18	18	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	12	12	100.0%
Communication services	2	2	100.0%
Personal assistance	2	2	100.0%
All services	541	541	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 12 of 12 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 29 of 29 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 207 of 207 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 49 of 49 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 36 of 36 requests filled (100.0%).
Transportation: 18 of 18 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	59	26	33
Communication	25	18	7
Mobility and transportation	17	13	4
Community-based living	106	78	28
Educational	7	3	4
Vocational	50	29	21
Self-care	23	8	15
Information access and technology	13	10	3
Personal resource management	103	78	25
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	21	8	13
Community and social participation	27	11	16
Other	18	7	11

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	48
20 to 24	27
25 to 59	178
60 and older	78
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	66
Mental or emotional	127
Physical	109
Hearing	7
Vision	7
Multiple disabilities	7
Other	9

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Wisconsin residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 6 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	292	89.6%	80.0%	1.12
Black or African American	13	4.0%	6.9%	0.58
American Indian or Alaska Native	6	1.8%	1.0%	1.80
Asian	2	0.6%	1.5%	0.41
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	0	0.0%	5.1%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	13	4.0%	5.4%	0.74

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.