COMMUNITIES ACTIVELY LIVING INDEPENDENT & FREE

What the center reported

1,260Consumers served813 carried over, 447 new
12,071Information and referral contacts
$2,628,498Total income
$0Part B
$164,334Part C
672Goals achievedof 986 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$164,334
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$255,765
State government funds	$1,532,364
Local government funds	$36,019
Private and other	$640,016
Total income	$2,628,498

Eight years of reports

COMMUNITIES ACTIVELY LIVING INDEPENDENT & FREE by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,138	$2,144,627	$17,678	$129,074	0
2017	707	$1,813,736	$15,131	$129,119	0
2018	803	$753,372	$18,017	$145,406	3
2019	631	$1,042,270	$57,642	$149,773	2
2020	753	$1,518,465	$33,548	$149,773	8
2021	860	$1,390,388	$62,176	$149,507	1
2022	1,048	$1,947,398	$24,303	$151,274	0
2023	1,260	$2,628,498	$0	$164,334	2

Consumers served, by year

20161,138
2017707
2018803
2019631
2020753
2021860
20221,048
20231,260

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,086	67th	89th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$3,911	64th	88th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	68.2%	73th	79th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	74.1%	60th	70th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.16	26th	25th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.22	48th	40th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	90.4%	26th	33th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	50.0%	3th	4th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 3 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	97.0%	80th	98th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 20.7 of 21.3 FTE.
Equity index	46.1	12th	7th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	34.3%	21th	29th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 6.3% of income; Part B varied by 70.5% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (12,071) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	395	376	95.2%
Communication services	236	218	92.4%
Advocacy and legal services	196	170	86.7%
Assistive technology	129	121	93.8%
IL skills training	127	109	85.8%
Counseling and related services	93	91	97.8%
Peer counseling	65	60	92.3%
Other services	52	44	84.6%
Transportation	28	15	53.6%
Personal assistance	22	20	90.9%
Youth transition	17	11	64.7%
Mobility training	7	2	28.6%
Children's services	4	4	100.0%
Preventive services	3	2	66.7%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
Physical restoration	1	1	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	0	0.0%
Therapeutic treatment	1	1	100.0%
Vocational services	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,379	1,247	90.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Transportation: 15 of 28 requests filled (53.6%).
Youth transition: 11 of 17 requests filled (64.7%).
Other services: 44 of 52 requests filled (84.6%).
IL skills training: 109 of 127 requests filled (85.8%).
Advocacy and legal services: 170 of 196 requests filled (86.7%).
Personal assistance: 20 of 22 requests filled (90.9%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	149	88	49
Communication	144	115	28
Mobility and transportation	37	18	17
Community-based living	241	129	87
Educational	173	162	11
Vocational	2	0	2
Self-care	34	17	16
Information access and technology	119	70	49
Personal resource management	13	11	2
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	4	2	1
Community and social participation	11	9	1
Other	59	51	6

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	5
5 to 19	46
20 to 24	28
25 to 59	396
60 and older	784
Age unavailable	1

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	59
Mental or emotional	196
Physical	776
Hearing	54
Vision	64
Multiple disabilities	73
Other	38

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 7 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	106	8.5%	42.3%	0.20
Black or African American	248	19.8%	6.4%	3.11
American Indian or Alaska Native	6	0.5%	1.2%	0.40
Asian	482	38.5%	10.2%	3.78
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	3	0.2%	0.4%	0.67
Two or more races	7	0.6%	11.9%	0.05
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	401	32.0%	27.6%	1.16

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.