Bainbridge Advocacy Individual Network, Inc.

What the center reported

181Consumers served90 carried over, 91 new
1,622Information and referral contacts
$581,089Total income
$35,499Part B
$197,101Part C
198Goals achievedof 425 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$35,499
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$197,101
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$340,739
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$7,750
Total income	$581,089

Eight years of reports

Bainbridge Advocacy Individual Network, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	199	$435,273	$174,865	$146,368	13
2017	246	$376,305	$32,550	$146,827	11
2018	226	$581,882	$32,550	$166,447	9
2019	355	$583,725	$32,550	$172,168	8
2020	536	$413,472	$52,500	$172,168	4
2021	248	$412,926	$52,500	$171,574	7
2022	248	$504,074	$200,000	$177,746	4
2023	181	$581,089	$35,499	$197,101	2

Consumers served, by year

2016199
2017246
2018226
2019355
2020536
2021248
2022248
2023181

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,210	48th	28th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,935	71th	55th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	46.6%	46th	44th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	93.2%	89th	86th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.10	56th	56th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.01	45th	56th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	77th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	89th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 4 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	76th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.0 of 10.0 FTE.
Equity index	43.1	15th	24th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	16.8%	62th	58th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 40.0% of income; Part B varied by 84.5% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,622) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	111	111	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	109	109	100.0%
IL skills training	65	65	100.0%
Assistive technology	48	48	100.0%
Transportation	45	45	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	25	25	100.0%
Youth transition	20	20	100.0%
Physical restoration	14	14	100.0%
Vocational services	13	13	100.0%
Recreational services	12	12	100.0%
Personal assistance	11	11	100.0%
Communication services	7	7	100.0%
Counseling and related services	6	6	100.0%
Mobility training	5	5	100.0%
Family services	2	2	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Preventive services	1	1	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	1	1	100.0%
All services	496	496	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 25 of 25 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 48 of 48 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 109 of 109 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 65 of 65 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 111 of 111 requests filled (100.0%).
Personal assistance: 11 of 11 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	16	13	3
Communication	1	0	1
Mobility and transportation	105	68	32
Community-based living	125	45	59
Educational	3	1	2
Vocational	4	3	0
Self-care	58	28	27
Information access and technology	72	17	49
Personal resource management	34	20	10
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	6	2	2
Community and social participation	1	1	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	8
20 to 24	2
25 to 59	58
60 and older	112
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	14
Mental or emotional	6
Physical	134
Hearing	1
Vision	24
Multiple disabilities	2
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Georgia residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	42	23.2%	54.4%	0.43
Black or African American	135	74.6%	31.5%	2.37
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.3%	0.00
Asian	0	0.0%	2.2%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	0	0.0%	5.5%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	4	2.2%	6.1%	0.36

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.