accessABILITY Center for Independent Living, Inc.

What the center reported

313Consumers served147 carried over, 166 new
3,433Information and referral contacts
$849,872Total income
$27,177Part B
$401,608Part C
286Goals achievedof 576 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$27,177
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$401,608
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$77,993
Other federal funds	$114,429
State government funds	$152,046
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$76,619
Total income	$849,872

Eight years of reports

accessABILITY Center for Independent Living, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	354	$688,769	$33,293	$309,175	4
2017	349	$600,268	$33,292	$307,637	4
2018	366	$649,817	$94,217	$346,213	5
2019	289	$711,117	$24,339	$355,828	3
2020	274	$813,471	$25,435	$355,828	1
2021	321	$1,011,385	$26,121	$355,196	2
2022	295	$872,150	$27,145	$362,461	2
2023	313	$849,872	$27,177	$401,608	1

Consumers served, by year

2016354
2017349
2018366
2019289
2020274
2021321
2022295
2023313

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,715	53th	46th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,972	70th	68th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	49.7%	48th	57th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	45.5%	35th	34th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.32	33th	30th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.25	24th	23th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	99.3%	49th	51th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	88.0%	81th	83th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	66.0%	28th	22th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.1 of 15.4 FTE.
Equity index	31.1	31th	31th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	16.5%	63th	59th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 59.6% of income; Part B varied by 60.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (3,433) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	172	172	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	93	93	100.0%
IL skills training	78	78	100.0%
Assistive technology	76	76	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	67	67	100.0%
Personal assistance	47	47	100.0%
Vocational services	21	19	90.5%
Transportation	18	18	100.0%
Mobility training	12	11	91.7%
Other services	5	4	80.0%
Communication services	2	2	100.0%
Counseling and related services	2	2	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	2	2	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
Youth transition	1	1	100.0%
All services	597	593	99.3%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Vocational services: 19 of 21 requests filled (90.5%).
Mobility training: 11 of 12 requests filled (91.7%).
Advocacy and legal services: 67 of 67 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 76 of 76 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 93 of 93 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 78 of 78 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	100	67	24
Communication	4	2	1
Mobility and transportation	39	15	16
Community-based living	99	37	40
Educational	10	4	4
Vocational	23	3	12
Self-care	44	34	5
Information access and technology	153	76	62
Personal resource management	75	43	21
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	5	1	2
Community and social participation	15	3	10
Other	9	1	3

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	5
20 to 24	7
25 to 59	122
60 and older	179
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	9
Mental or emotional	29
Physical	55
Hearing	2
Vision	42
Multiple disabilities	170
Other	6

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Indiana residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 7 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	161	52.6%	78.5%	0.67
Black or African American	99	32.4%	9.2%	3.53
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.3%	0.00
Asian	0	0.0%	1.1%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	5	1.6%	5.5%	0.30
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	41	13.4%	5.5%	2.45

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.