Three Rivers, Inc

What the center reported

768Consumers served463 carried over, 305 new
7,705Information and referral contacts
$8,133,009Total income
$58,444Part B
$47,207Part C
598Goals achievedof 935 set
9Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$58,444
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$47,207
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$209,128
State government funds	$6,751,647
Local government funds	$46,200
Private and other	$1,020,383
Total income	$8,133,009

Eight years of reports

Three Rivers, Inc by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	489	$3,474,406	$0	$36,203	7
2017	481	$3,803,421	$0	$36,203	1
2018	550	$4,247,218	$0	$40,826	2
2019	475	$5,072,108	$0	$41,982	12
2020	526	$5,363,862	$342,946	$41,982	11
2021	631	$5,243,395	$37,037	$41,982	3
2022	634	$6,891,333	$108,699	$42,907	6
2023	768	$8,133,009	$58,444	$47,207	9

Consumers served, by year

2016489
2017481
2018550
2019475
2020526
2021631
2022634
2023768

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$10,590	11th	36th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$13,600	26th	49th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	64.0%	67th	66th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	32.7%	25th	28th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.17	58th	62th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	19.06	90th	88th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	80.0%	67th	80th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 5 members.
Staff with disabilities	83.0%	62th	83th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 19.0 of 23.0 FTE.
Equity index	9.1	90th	84th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	27.9%	30th	39th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 1.3% of income; Part B varied by 160.8% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (7,705) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Personal assistance	561	561	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	370	370	100.0%
IL skills training	223	223	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	79	79	100.0%
Assistive technology	70	70	100.0%
Youth transition	67	67	100.0%
Recreational services	57	57	100.0%
Vocational services	52	52	100.0%
Peer counseling	50	50	100.0%
Transportation	28	28	100.0%
Physical restoration	9	9	100.0%
Preventive services	9	9	100.0%
Communication services	2	2	100.0%
Counseling and related services	1	1	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,580	1,580	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 370 of 370 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 70 of 70 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 79 of 79 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 223 of 223 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 50 of 50 requests filled (100.0%).
Personal assistance: 561 of 561 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	35	19	15
Communication	10	3	7
Mobility and transportation	18	7	10
Community-based living	641	439	198
Educational	12	3	8
Vocational	55	44	9
Self-care	29	16	11
Information access and technology	12	8	3
Personal resource management	101	48	50
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	19	9	6
Community and social participation	3	2	1

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	31
20 to 24	31
25 to 59	282
60 and older	424
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	116
Mental or emotional	58
Physical	430
Hearing	8
Vision	26
Multiple disabilities	130
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Kansas residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	584	76.0%	75.6%	1.01
Black or African American	84	10.9%	5.8%	1.89
American Indian or Alaska Native	33	4.3%	0.9%	4.95
Asian	10	1.3%	1.4%	0.91
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.1%	0.0%	2.98
Two or more races	11	1.4%	7.3%	0.20
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	45	5.9%	9.0%	0.65

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.