New Horizons Independent Living Center

What the center reported

977Consumers served261 carried over, 716 new
4,978Information and referral contacts
$1,493,386Total income
$178,702Part B
$339,530Part C
684Goals achievedof 903 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$178,702
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$339,530
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$975,155
Total income	$1,493,386

Eight years of reports

New Horizons Independent Living Center by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	656	$2,227,748	$165,918	$271,780	5
2017	632	$1,199,074	$212,890	$280,108	2
2018	623	$1,274,634	$161,336	$301,071	2
2019	669	$1,283,539	$172,975	$311,110	1
2020	1,048	$1,416,680	$175,190	$311,110	4
2021	1,080	$1,802,792	$169,358	$310,557	1
2022	1,070	$1,650,401	$169,358	$314,228	1
2023	977	$1,493,386	$178,702	$339,530	1

Consumers served, by year

2016656
2017632
2018623
2019669
20201,048
20211,080
20221,070
2023977

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,529	81th	85th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,183	77th	74th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	75.7%	84th	79th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	89.1%	82th	79th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.10	23th	22th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.29	25th	28th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	89.6%	25th	19th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	57.0%	14th	18th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 14 members.
Staff with disabilities	63.0%	24th	25th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.4 of 16.6 FTE.
Equity index	9.9	89th	86th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	20.8%	48th	53th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 34.7% of income; Part B varied by 8.5% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (4,978) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Assistive technology	525	512	97.5%
Communication services	383	355	92.7%
Physical restoration	359	292	81.3%
Preventive services	113	97	85.8%
IL skills training	100	88	88.0%
Personal assistance	48	36	75.0%
Vocational services	40	37	92.5%
Advocacy and legal services	30	26	86.7%
Housing and home modifications	21	21	100.0%
Other services	21	18	85.7%
Youth transition	20	8	40.0%
Peer counseling	11	9	81.8%
Transportation	7	6	85.7%
Recreational services	6	6	100.0%
Family services	5	3	60.0%
Counseling and related services	4	4	100.0%
Children's services	2	2	100.0%
Mental restoration	2	2	100.0%
Mobility training	1	0	0.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	1	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,700	1,524	89.6%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Youth transition: 8 of 20 requests filled (40.0%).
Personal assistance: 36 of 48 requests filled (75.0%).
Physical restoration: 292 of 359 requests filled (81.3%).
Peer counseling: 9 of 11 requests filled (81.8%).
Other services: 18 of 21 requests filled (85.7%).
Preventive services: 97 of 113 requests filled (85.8%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	10	8	2
Communication	498	434	63
Mobility and transportation	72	50	22
Community-based living	125	92	32
Educational	5	0	5
Vocational	55	18	22
Self-care	40	24	16
Information access and technology	32	25	6
Personal resource management	20	14	5
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	7	1	6
Community and social participation	7	3	4
Other	32	15	15

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	3
5 to 19	5
20 to 24	18
25 to 59	235
60 and older	716
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	22
Mental or emotional	54
Physical	210
Hearing	512
Vision	9
Multiple disabilities	143
Other	27

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Louisiana residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 13 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	564	58.5%	58.0%	1.01
Black or African American	379	39.3%	30.3%	1.30
American Indian or Alaska Native	8	0.8%	0.6%	1.38
Asian	0	0.0%	0.9%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	3	0.3%	0.1%	3.76
Two or more races	2	0.2%	5.5%	0.04
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	8	0.8%	4.5%	0.18

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.