Paraquad, Inc.

What the center reported

1,216Consumers served732 carried over, 484 new
249Information and referral contacts
$19,723,956Total income
$0Part B
$529,652Part C
735Goals achievedof 1,423 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$529,652
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$408,443
State government funds	$240,154
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$18,545,707
Total income	$19,723,956

Eight years of reports

Paraquad, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,822	$18,765,658	$0	$413,542	17
2017	1,740	$15,784,234	$0	$411,425	12
2018	1,663	$14,566,909	$0	$462,790	25
2019	1,364	$17,420,400	$0	$474,828	4
2020	1,267	$14,036,927	$0	$474,828	0
2021	1,153	$15,685,024	$0	$473,984	0
2022	1,165	$14,544,081	$0	$480,336	0
2023	1,216	$19,723,956	$0	$529,652	2

Consumers served, by year

20161,822
20171,740
20181,663
20191,364
20201,267
20211,153
20221,165
20231,216

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$16,220	6th	17th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$26,835	11th	23th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	51.7%	51th	47th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	46.2%	36th	39th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.16	26th	25th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.38	29th	22th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	67.6%	8th	9th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	53.0%	4th	7th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 10 of 19 members.
Staff with disabilities	59.0%	18th	31th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 39.0 of 66.0 FTE.
Equity index	47.4	11th	5th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	12.0%	81th	82th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 2.7% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (249) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Personal assistance	433	311	71.8%
Physical restoration	332	54	16.3%
IL skills training	288	279	96.9%
Vocational services	160	143	89.4%
Transportation	149	147	98.7%
Assistive technology	89	89	100.0%
Peer counseling	83	77	92.8%
Youth transition	77	42	54.5%
Preventive services	64	1	1.6%
Other services	52	35	67.3%
Advocacy and legal services	35	21	60.0%
Mobility training	16	0	0.0%
Therapeutic treatment	14	14	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	3	1	33.3%
Recreational services	1	0	0.0%
All services	1,796	1,214	67.6%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Mobility training: 0 of 16 requests filled (0.0%).
Preventive services: 1 of 64 requests filled (1.6%).
Physical restoration: 54 of 332 requests filled (16.3%).
Youth transition: 42 of 77 requests filled (54.5%).
Advocacy and legal services: 21 of 35 requests filled (60.0%).
Other services: 35 of 52 requests filled (67.3%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	91	30	50
Communication	45	15	24
Mobility and transportation	452	76	252
Community-based living	503	419	22
Educational	104	65	0
Vocational	63	35	4
Self-care	82	46	2
Information access and technology	11	8	1
Personal resource management	20	13	5
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	4	2	2
Community and social participation	39	24	1
Other	9	2	2

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	1
5 to 19	60
20 to 24	56
25 to 59	570
60 and older	522
Age unavailable	7

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	212
Mental or emotional	25
Physical	846
Hearing	18
Vision	32
Multiple disabilities	0
Other	83

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Missouri residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 32 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	443	37.4%	78.0%	0.48
Black or African American	683	57.7%	11.7%	4.93
American Indian or Alaska Native	10	0.8%	0.4%	2.34
Asian	22	1.9%	1.0%	1.94
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	11	0.9%	5.5%	0.17
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	15	1.3%	3.4%	0.38

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.