Summit Independent Living Center, Inc.

What the center reported

545Consumers served365 carried over, 180 new
6,695Information and referral contacts
$7,906,009Total income
$8,419Part B
$459,189Part C
922Goals achievedof 1,067 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$8,419
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$459,189
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$63,061
State government funds	$7,202,118
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$173,222
Total income	$7,906,009

Eight years of reports

Summit Independent Living Center, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	790	$5,687,584	$23,809	$352,156	2
2017	754	$5,368,564	$30,483	$352,156	3
2018	752	$6,097,386	$13,234	$397,128	1
2019	669	$5,924,110	$13,183	$408,371	4
2020	651	$6,359,723	$9,456	$408,371	3
2021	607	$7,060,910	$6,409	$408,371	1
2022	557	$6,614,950	$5,242	$417,365	2
2023	545	$7,906,009	$8,419	$459,189	2

Consumers served, by year

2016790
2017754
2018752
2019669
2020651
2021607
2022557
2023545

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$14,506	8th	27th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$8,575	36th	61th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	86.4%	91th	95th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	82.0%	69th	78th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.37	34th	37th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.44	31th	25th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	63.0%	27th	29th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	66.0%	28th	50th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 17.1 of 25.8 FTE.
Equity index	3.8	99th	99th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	11.9%	82th	85th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 5.9% of income; Part B varied by 60.4% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (6,695) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	275	275	100.0%
Personal assistance	243	243	100.0%
Transportation	153	153	100.0%
Assistive technology	48	48	100.0%
Peer counseling	33	33	100.0%
IL skills training	20	20	100.0%
Youth transition	18	18	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	14	14	100.0%
Vocational services	12	12	100.0%
Communication services	2	2	100.0%
Recreational services	1	1	100.0%
All services	819	819	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 275 of 275 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 48 of 48 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 14 of 14 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 20 of 20 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 33 of 33 requests filled (100.0%).
Personal assistance: 243 of 243 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	19	12	5
Communication	48	48	0
Mobility and transportation	231	231	0
Community-based living	239	232	5
Educational	9	8	1
Vocational	19	14	4
Self-care	230	230	0
Information access and technology	1	0	1
Personal resource management	263	140	113
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	3	2	1
Community and social participation	5	5	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	3
5 to 19	32
20 to 24	42
25 to 59	329
60 and older	139
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	63
Mental or emotional	70
Physical	173
Hearing	2
Vision	8
Multiple disabilities	177
Other	52

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Montana residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 26 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	432	83.2%	83.6%	1.00
Black or African American	1	0.2%	0.4%	0.47
American Indian or Alaska Native	48	9.2%	6.2%	1.49
Asian	5	1.0%	0.6%	1.75
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.4%	0.0%	9.36
Two or more races	16	3.1%	5.9%	0.52
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	15	2.9%	3.3%	0.88

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.