Universal Disability Advocates dba Alliance of Disability Advocates

What the center reported

396Consumers served302 carried over, 94 new
2,296Information and referral contacts
$1,877,786Total income
$185,184Part B
$437,416Part C
19Goals achievedof 534 set
3Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$185,184
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$437,416
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$1,203,613
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$51,572
Total income	$1,877,786

Eight years of reports

Universal Disability Advocates dba Alliance of Disability Advocates by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	98	$578,222	$62,673	$327,424	0
2017	124	$924,489	$31,966	$327,899	75
2018	199	$830,795	$36,807	$372,084	2
2019	223	$993,014	$26,304	$450,927	0
2020	280	$1,413,730	$27,869	$385,229	10
2021	351	$1,348,450	$52,546	$386,909	23
2022	368	$1,755,831	$116,225	$399,633	2
2023	396	$1,877,786	$185,184	$437,416	3

Consumers served, by year

201698
2017124
2018199
2019223
2020280
2021351
2022368
2023396

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$4,742	29th	19th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$98,831	3th	3th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	3.6%	2th	3th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	3.5%	7th	7th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.76	48th	52th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.69	40th	37th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	43.4%	1th	3th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	56.0%	9th	11th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	56.0%	12th	13th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 15.0 of 27.0 FTE.
Equity index	41.9	16th	13th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	35.3%	20th	20th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 33.2% of income; Part B varied by 77.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (2,296) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	149	112	75.2%
Youth transition	126	20	15.9%
IL skills training	104	59	56.7%
Advocacy and legal services	89	48	53.9%
Housing and home modifications	57	21	36.8%
Other services	31	16	51.6%
Transportation	19	7	36.8%
Vocational services	18	1	5.6%
Preventive services	16	0	0.0%
Communication services	13	0	0.0%
Therapeutic treatment	12	0	0.0%
Counseling and related services	11	2	18.2%
Assistive technology	10	6	60.0%
Personal assistance	9	3	33.3%
Mental restoration	6	1	16.7%
Family services	3	0	0.0%
Mobility training	3	0	0.0%
Children's services	2	0	0.0%
Recreational services	2	0	0.0%
Physical restoration	1	0	0.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	0	0.0%
All services	682	296	43.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Communication services: 0 of 13 requests filled (0.0%).
Preventive services: 0 of 16 requests filled (0.0%).
Therapeutic treatment: 0 of 12 requests filled (0.0%).
Vocational services: 1 of 18 requests filled (5.6%).
Youth transition: 20 of 126 requests filled (15.9%).
Counseling and related services: 2 of 11 requests filled (18.2%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	17	1	14
Communication	5	0	3
Mobility and transportation	51	1	46
Community-based living	111	9	96
Educational	38	0	38
Vocational	43	1	42
Self-care	26	0	26
Information access and technology	17	0	17
Personal resource management	33	2	29
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	18	3	15
Community and social participation	167	1	163
Other	8	1	7

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	3
5 to 19	1
20 to 24	13
25 to 59	271
60 and older	108
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	31
Mental or emotional	245
Physical	46
Hearing	4
Vision	10
Multiple disabilities	33
Other	27

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with North Carolina residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 35 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	104	28.8%	64.8%	0.44
Black or African American	219	60.7%	21.6%	2.81
American Indian or Alaska Native	15	4.2%	1.3%	3.15
Asian	5	1.4%	1.4%	1.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	8	2.2%	5.2%	0.43
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	10	2.8%	5.7%	0.49

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.