League of Human Dignity

What the center reported

783Consumers served272 carried over, 511 new
12,582Information and referral contacts
$1,052,988Total income
$91,744Part B
$904,436Part C
539Goals achievedof 1,193 set
9Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$91,744
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$904,436
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$38,116
Private and other	$18,692
Total income	$1,052,988

Eight years of reports

League of Human Dignity by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	304	$975,043	$0	$693,619	0
2017	323	$888,069	$40,324	$693,619	2
2018	409	$975,848	$69,238	$782,198	5
2019	613	$996,714	$92,814	$804,343	6
2020	752	$1,013,292	$70,199	$804,343	8
2021	810	$1,214,231	$141,225	$804,343	2
2022	628	$1,128,713	$231,672	$822,058	12
2023	783	$1,052,988	$91,744	$904,436	9

Consumers served, by year

2016304
2017323
2018409
2019613
2020752
2021810
2022628
2023783

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,345	85th	86th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,954	80th	80th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	45.2%	44th	52th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	72.3%	55th	57th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.15	57th	51th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.00	44th	46th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	95th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 9 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	85.0%	66th	59th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.0 of 11.7 FTE.
Equity index	13.2	77th	84th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	9.2%	92th	92th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 94.6% of income; Part B varied by 70.8% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (12,582) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	2,811	2,811	100.0%
Peer counseling	2,055	2,055	100.0%
IL skills training	1,136	1,136	100.0%
Other services	1,059	1,059	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	314	314	100.0%
Youth transition	222	222	100.0%
Transportation	183	183	100.0%
Assistive technology	78	78	100.0%
Personal assistance	67	67	100.0%
Vocational services	44	44	100.0%
Family services	24	24	100.0%
Preventive services	21	21	100.0%
Children's services	7	7	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	6	6	100.0%
Communication services	5	5	100.0%
Counseling and related services	3	3	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	3	3	100.0%
Recreational services	3	3	100.0%
Mobility training	2	2	100.0%
Physical restoration	2	2	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	1	1	100.0%
All services	8,047	8,047	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 2,811 of 2,811 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 78 of 78 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 24 of 24 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 314 of 314 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 1,136 of 1,136 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 2,055 of 2,055 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	247	124	106
Communication	37	8	18
Mobility and transportation	33	12	17
Community-based living	276	109	121
Educational	12	2	7
Vocational	11	4	6
Self-care	179	97	68
Information access and technology	12	6	5
Personal resource management	302	155	127
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	26	9	12
Community and social participation	6	1	4
Other	52	12	38

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	5
5 to 19	63
20 to 24	37
25 to 59	412
60 and older	266
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	90
Mental or emotional	164
Physical	346
Hearing	11
Vision	28
Multiple disabilities	144
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Nebraska residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	565	72.2%	79.0%	0.91
Black or African American	129	16.5%	4.5%	3.65
American Indian or Alaska Native	17	2.2%	1.0%	2.22
Asian	7	0.9%	1.3%	0.69
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.1%	0.0%	2.89
Two or more races	31	4.0%	6.0%	0.66
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	33	4.2%	8.2%	0.52

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.