Granite State Independent Living

What the center reported

566Consumers served372 carried over, 194 new
8Information and referral contacts
$18,839,250Total income
$87,219Part B
$709,695Part C
1,078Goals achievedof 2,101 set
5Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$87,219
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$709,695
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$2,449,105
State government funds	$1,425,250
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$14,167,981
Total income	$18,839,250

Eight years of reports

Granite State Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	237	$9,771,034	$39,123	$544,270	1
2017	275	$13,067,175	$140,760	$544,270	4
2018	330	$12,039,522	$118,610	$613,776	1
2019	419	$12,009,996	$93,668	$631,153	4
2020	485	$11,891,681	$113,418	$631,153	2
2021	472	$12,659,349	$94,231	$631,153	0
2022	535	$15,179,410	$92,856	$631,153	4
2023	566	$18,839,250	$87,219	$709,695	5

Consumers served, by year

2016237
2017275
2018330
2019419
2020485
2021472
2022535
2023566

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$33,285	1th	3th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$17,476	20th	41th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	51.3%	50th	45th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	2.1%	6th	7th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.88	52th	55th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.70	40th	31th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	44th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 12 members.
Staff with disabilities	68.0%	33th	56th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 59.0 of 87.0 FTE.
Equity index	5.0	98th	96th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	19.4%	51th	58th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 4.2% of income; Part B varied by 28.4% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (8) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	685	685	100.0%
Personal assistance	186	186	100.0%
Youth transition	96	96	100.0%
Communication services	63	63	100.0%
Transportation	45	45	100.0%
Peer counseling	37	37	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	30	30	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	21	21	100.0%
Assistive technology	16	16	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	14	14	100.0%
Vocational services	8	8	100.0%
Recreational services	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,202	1,202	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 30 of 30 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 16 of 16 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 63 of 63 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 21 of 21 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 685 of 685 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 37 of 37 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	274	153	99
Communication	121	71	37
Mobility and transportation	102	38	46
Community-based living	570	279	213
Educational	201	112	67
Vocational	155	83	41
Self-care	254	131	120
Information access and technology	256	123	90
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	10	5	4
Community and social participation	138	77	50
Other	20	6	4

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	8
5 to 19	208
20 to 24	22
25 to 59	137
60 and older	191
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	114
Mental or emotional	64
Physical	324
Hearing	36
Vision	9
Multiple disabilities	0
Other	19

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New Hampshire residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 7 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	500	89.4%	89.5%	1.00
Black or African American	20	3.6%	1.2%	3.02
American Indian or Alaska Native	8	1.4%	0.2%	6.44
Asian	4	0.7%	1.3%	0.53
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.4%	0.1%	6.18
Two or more races	0	0.0%	4.3%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	25	4.5%	3.4%	1.33

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.