Heart of Central Texas Independent Living Center, Inc..

What the center reported

518Consumers served129 carried over, 389 new
1,357Information and referral contacts
$3,475,012Total income
$0Part B
$367,204Part C
379Goals achievedof 505 set
54Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$367,204
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$2,859,102
Local government funds	$14,208
Private and other	$234,498
Total income	$3,475,012

Eight years of reports

Heart of Central Texas Independent Living Center, Inc.. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	956	$3,532,913	$1,732,471	$266,256	28
2017	1,240	$3,791,337	$0	$269,035	51
2018	1,240	$3,935,185	$1,704,502	$306,488	53
2019	607	$3,076,256	$0	$318,376	48
2020	562	$2,731,490	$0	$318,990	46
2021	396	$2,586,660	$0	$320,869	32
2022	480	$3,279,255	$0	$332,023	40
2023	518	$3,475,012	$0	$367,204	54

Consumers served, by year

2016956
20171,240
20181,240
2019607
2020562
2021396
2022480
2023518

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$6,709	18th	48th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$9,169	35th	58th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	75.0%	82th	87th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	84.4%	73th	82th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	10.42	91th	96th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	14.71	86th	82th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	82.4%	17th	20th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	44th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 4 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	67.0%	30th	52th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 6.0 of 9.0 FTE.
Equity index	19.1	58th	56th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	13.6%	75th	76th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 10.6% of income; Part B varied by 173.2% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,357) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Children's services	252	250	99.2%
Peer counseling	155	152	98.1%
Other services	146	62	42.5%
Advocacy and legal services	62	51	82.3%
Youth transition	36	34	94.4%
Recreational services	29	29	100.0%
IL skills training	24	12	50.0%
Personal assistance	21	17	81.0%
Vocational services	17	15	88.2%
Assistive technology	14	7	50.0%
Housing and home modifications	10	3	30.0%
Transportation	4	2	50.0%
Communication services	3	3	100.0%
Counseling and related services	2	1	50.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	1	1	100.0%
All services	777	640	82.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Housing and home modifications: 3 of 10 requests filled (30.0%).
Other services: 62 of 146 requests filled (42.5%).
Assistive technology: 7 of 14 requests filled (50.0%).
IL skills training: 12 of 24 requests filled (50.0%).
Personal assistance: 17 of 21 requests filled (81.0%).
Advocacy and legal services: 51 of 62 requests filled (82.3%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	9	3	5
Communication	56	55	1
Mobility and transportation	10	4	4
Community-based living	74	56	9
Educational	63	62	1
Vocational	26	21	5
Self-care	18	18	0
Information access and technology	11	4	5
Personal resource management	4	4	0
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	127	54	44
Community and social participation	22	17	3
Other	85	81	3

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	38
5 to 19	220
20 to 24	21
25 to 59	118
60 and older	121
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	209
Mental or emotional	63
Physical	106
Hearing	4
Vision	16
Multiple disabilities	74
Other	46

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Texas residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 14 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	260	51.6%	45.8%	1.13
Black or African American	122	24.2%	10.8%	2.23
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.2%	0.6%	0.34
Asian	4	0.8%	2.3%	0.34
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	16	3.2%	13.7%	0.23
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	101	20.0%	26.7%	0.75

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.