ENDependence Center of Northern Virginia

What the center reported

763Consumers served655 carried over, 108 new
83Information and referral contacts
$3,336,756Total income
$26,000Part B
$452,636Part C
27Goals achievedof 1,166 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$26,000
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$452,636
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$53,196
State government funds	$565,142
Local government funds	$649,769
Private and other	$1,590,012
Total income	$3,336,756

Eight years of reports

ENDependence Center of Northern Virginia by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	639	$1,280,757	$21,117	$346,360	3
2017	540	$1,210,376	$23,500	$345,788	5
2018	511	$1,196,200	$25,642	$389,698	2
2019	526	$1,142,097	$25,642	$401,250	1
2020	472	$1,216,800	$26,000	$401,250	1
2021	536	$1,947,400	$26,000	$400,537	0
2022	689	$2,379,454	$26,000	$419,171	0
2023	763	$3,336,756	$26,000	$452,636	0

Consumers served, by year

2016639
2017540
2018511
2019526
2020472
2021536
2022689
2023763

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$4,373	32th	67th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$123,584	2th	3th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	2.3%	1th	2th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	75.0%	63th	75th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	9th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	9th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	44th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	71.0%	38th	64th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 23.0 of 32.5 FTE.
Equity index	29.0	35th	27th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	43.3%	11th	15th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 14.3% of income; Part B varied by 6.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (83) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	128	128	100.0%
Mobility training	60	60	100.0%
IL skills training	51	51	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	38	38	100.0%
Transportation	33	33	100.0%
Peer counseling	17	17	100.0%
Assistive technology	6	6	100.0%
Other services	6	6	100.0%
Communication services	5	5	100.0%
Counseling and related services	3	3	100.0%
Vocational services	3	3	100.0%
Family services	2	2	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Preventive services	1	1	100.0%
Youth transition	1	1	100.0%
All services	355	355	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 38 of 38 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 128 of 128 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 51 of 51 requests filled (100.0%).
Mobility training: 60 of 60 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 17 of 17 requests filled (100.0%).
Transportation: 33 of 33 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	356	19	337
Communication	9	0	9
Mobility and transportation	237	7	230
Community-based living	114	0	114
Educational	37	0	37
Vocational	79	0	79
Self-care	159	0	159
Information access and technology	17	0	17
Personal resource management	81	1	80
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	23	0	23
Community and social participation	28	0	28
Other	26	0	26

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	10
5 to 19	110
20 to 24	135
25 to 59	346
60 and older	160
Age unavailable	2

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	273
Mental or emotional	89
Physical	287
Hearing	14
Vision	22
Multiple disabilities	9
Other	69

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Virginia residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 89 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	256	38.0%	63.1%	0.60
Black or African American	229	34.0%	20.3%	1.68
American Indian or Alaska Native	2	0.3%	0.4%	0.83
Asian	75	11.1%	3.8%	2.96
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.3%	0.1%	3.53
Two or more races	14	2.1%	5.9%	0.35
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	96	14.2%	6.5%	2.20

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.