Everybody Counts

What the center reported

133Consumers served22 carried over, 111 new
187Information and referral contacts
$507,976Total income
$170,556Part B
$159,820Part C
436Goals achievedof 640 set
23Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$170,556
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$159,820
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$33,170
State government funds	$144,429
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$0
Total income	$507,976

Eight years of reports

Everybody Counts by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	82	$274,458	$41,874	$123,037	13
2017	87	$373,845	$36,992	$122,425	29
2018	102	$292,052	$39,845	$137,776	14
2019	113	$403,563	$24,339	$141,602	4
2020	248	$433,974	$32,700	$141,602	3
2021	257	$653,797	$22,490	$119,584	102
2022	143	$374,391	$30,160	$144,241	50
2023	133	$507,976	$170,556	$159,820	23

Consumers served, by year

201682
201787
2018102
2019113
2020248
2021257
2022143
2023133

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,819	39th	23th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,165	89th	79th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	68.1%	73th	66th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	74.2%	60th	56th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	17.29	96th	95th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	14.39	85th	87th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	99.1%	47th	48th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	86.0%	77th	66th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	76th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 6.0 of 6.0 FTE.
Equity index	50.8	9th	15th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	27.6%	31th	31th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 65.0% of income; Part B varied by 92.4% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (187) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	85	83	97.6%
Peer counseling	85	85	100.0%
Preventive services	82	81	98.8%
IL skills training	72	72	100.0%
Communication services	46	46	100.0%
Family services	27	26	96.3%
Transportation	27	27	100.0%
Assistive technology	21	21	100.0%
Recreational services	21	21	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	20	19	95.0%
Rehabilitation technology	13	13	100.0%
Vocational services	13	13	100.0%
Personal assistance	11	11	100.0%
Mobility training	10	10	100.0%
Youth transition	10	10	100.0%
Counseling and related services	9	9	100.0%
Physical restoration	7	7	100.0%
Mental restoration	6	6	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	4	4	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
All services	570	565	99.1%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Housing and home modifications: 19 of 20 requests filled (95.0%).
Family services: 26 of 27 requests filled (96.3%).
Advocacy and legal services: 83 of 85 requests filled (97.6%).
Preventive services: 81 of 82 requests filled (98.8%).
Assistive technology: 21 of 21 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 46 of 46 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	101	68	33
Communication	50	31	19
Mobility and transportation	46	28	18
Community-based living	93	50	43
Educational	50	44	6
Vocational	21	10	11
Self-care	95	67	32
Information access and technology	29	20	9
Personal resource management	49	41	8
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	30	23	7
Community and social participation	76	54	22

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	4
20 to 24	6
25 to 59	62
60 and older	46
Age unavailable	15

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	15
Mental or emotional	8
Physical	71
Hearing	6
Vision	17
Multiple disabilities	16
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Indiana residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	45	33.8%	78.5%	0.43
Black or African American	76	57.1%	9.2%	6.24
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.3%	0.00
Asian	1	0.8%	1.1%	0.70
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	0	0.0%	5.5%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	11	8.3%	5.5%	1.51

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.