Independent Living Center of Mid-Missouri, Inc.

What the center reported

251Consumers served161 carried over, 90 new
921Information and referral contacts
$3,895,304Total income
$0Part B
$326,770Part C
39Goals achievedof 714 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$326,770
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$81,493
State government funds	$2,612,274
Local government funds	$91,012
Private and other	$783,756
Total income	$3,895,304

Eight years of reports

Independent Living Center of Mid-Missouri, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,200	$3,666,764	$0	$255,136	7
2017	1,013	$3,223,742	$0	$253,829	6
2018	1,032	$3,198,043	$0	$285,518	4
2019	748	$3,094,175	$0	$292,945	0
2020	462	$3,400,196	$0	$292,945	0
2021	425	$2,847,594	$0	$292,425	0
2022	452	$3,832,442	$0	$296,344	3
2023	251	$3,895,304	$0	$326,770	0

Consumers served, by year

20161,200
20171,013
20181,032
2019748
2020462
2021425
2022452
2023251

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$15,519	7th	19th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$99,880	3th	5th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	5.5%	4th	6th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	31.0%	23th	27th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	9th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	9th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	72.2%	11th	15th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	63.0%	27th	29th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 8 members.
Staff with disabilities	58.0%	17th	28th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.6 of 18.2 FTE.
Equity index	14.4	74th	69th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	10.3%	88th	91th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 8.4% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (921) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Other services	3,401	3,054	89.8%
Assistive technology	539	70	13.0%
Personal assistance	287	116	40.4%
Transportation	126	15	11.9%
Housing and home modifications	117	12	10.3%
Mental restoration	54	0	0.0%
Peer counseling	40	21	52.5%
Communication services	39	33	84.6%
Advocacy and legal services	32	17	53.1%
Recreational services	27	27	100.0%
IL skills training	13	13	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	13	11	84.6%
Youth transition	12	6	50.0%
Vocational services	7	7	100.0%
Counseling and related services	6	3	50.0%
Family services	2	2	100.0%
Preventive services	2	1	50.0%
All services	4,717	3,408	72.2%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Mental restoration: 0 of 54 requests filled (0.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 12 of 117 requests filled (10.3%).
Transportation: 15 of 126 requests filled (11.9%).
Assistive technology: 70 of 539 requests filled (13.0%).
Personal assistance: 116 of 287 requests filled (40.4%).
Youth transition: 6 of 12 requests filled (50.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	18	4	14
Communication	107	1	103
Mobility and transportation	34	13	18
Community-based living	149	14	135
Educational	40	0	36
Vocational	40	0	36
Self-care	202	4	189
Information access and technology	8	1	7
Personal resource management	11	1	8
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	3	0	3
Community and social participation	101	1	87
Other	1	0	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	3
20 to 24	7
25 to 59	69
60 and older	172
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	28
Mental or emotional	16
Physical	148
Hearing	9
Vision	18
Multiple disabilities	7
Other	25

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Missouri residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 10 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	168	69.7%	78.0%	0.89
Black or African American	54	22.4%	11.7%	1.91
American Indian or Alaska Native	8	3.3%	0.4%	9.19
Asian	4	1.7%	1.0%	1.73
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	3	1.2%	5.5%	0.23
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	4	1.7%	3.4%	0.50

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.