Services for Independent Living

What the center reported

279Consumers served166 carried over, 113 new
820Information and referral contacts
$968,866Total income
$7,128Part B
$489,820Part C
171Goals achievedof 289 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$7,128
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$489,820
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$40,922
State government funds	$226,710
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$204,287
Total income	$968,866

Eight years of reports

Services for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	237	$1,005,119	$7,001	$389,202	37
2017	213	$753,202	$7,537	$380,314	19
2018	314	$806,971	$7,540	$427,175	5
2019	284	$946,593	$7,540	$438,478	11
2020	264	$1,011,187	$7,454	$438,478	5
2021	241	$814,444	$7,540	$437,699	0
2022	235	$757,908	$7,536	$442,872	1
2023	279	$968,866	$7,128	$489,820	2

Consumers served, by year

2016237
2017213
2018314
2019284
2020264
2021241
2022235
2023279

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,473	45th	37th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$5,666	47th	43th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	59.2%	61th	69th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	55.7%	41th	41th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.72	47th	42th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.41	30th	28th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	78.0%	63th	66th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	89.0%	72th	67th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 8.0 of 9.0 FTE.
Equity index	23.1	48th	54th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	11.7%	83th	82th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 51.3% of income; Part B varied by 2.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (820) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Personal assistance	118	118	100.0%
Youth transition	84	84	100.0%
IL skills training	27	27	100.0%
Peer counseling	22	22	100.0%
Other services	9	9	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	2	2	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	2	2	100.0%
Vocational services	2	2	100.0%
Recreational services	1	1	100.0%
Transportation	1	1	100.0%
All services	268	268	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

IL skills training: 27 of 27 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 22 of 22 requests filled (100.0%).
Personal assistance: 118 of 118 requests filled (100.0%).
Youth transition: 84 of 84 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	2	1	1
Mobility and transportation	4	3	1
Community-based living	13	4	9
Educational	4	0	4
Vocational	4	2	2
Self-care	121	95	26
Personal resource management	13	7	6
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	13	2	11
Community and social participation	9	2	7
Other	106	55	51

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	82
20 to 24	28
25 to 59	131
60 and older	38
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	114
Mental or emotional	49
Physical	97
Hearing	5
Vision	9
Multiple disabilities	5
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Ohio residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 2 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	152	54.9%	77.0%	0.71
Black or African American	97	35.0%	13.0%	2.70
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.2%	0.00
Asian	5	1.8%	1.1%	1.71
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.4%	0.0%	10.68
Two or more races	13	4.7%	5.1%	0.93
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	9	3.2%	3.7%	0.88

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.