Able South Carolina

What the center reported

1,024Consumers served238 carried over, 786 new
7,285Information and referral contacts
$7,978,806Total income
$188,498Part B
$730,754Part C
1,369Goals achievedof 1,858 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$188,498
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$730,754
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$2,302,093
State government funds	$59,500
Local government funds	$38,316
Private and other	$4,659,645
Total income	$7,978,806

Eight years of reports

Able South Carolina by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,408	$1,811,738	$118,978	$540,345	4
2017	1,680	$2,140,289	$118,437	$542,862	1
2018	1,686	$2,676,906	$137,936	$617,792	3
2019	2,817	$3,924,572	$135,658	$639,788	3
2020	1,947	$3,549,857	$151,714	$639,788	3
2021	1,856	$6,445,145	$148,800	$645,003	2
2022	1,053	$7,075,081	$160,940	$668,005	5
2023	1,024	$7,978,806	$188,498	$730,754	0

Consumers served, by year

20161,408
20171,680
20181,686
20192,817
20201,947
20211,856
20221,053
20231,024

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$7,792	15th	43th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$5,828	47th	75th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	73.7%	81th	86th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	88.2%	81th	90th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	9th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	9th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	53.0%	4th	7th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 10 of 19 members.
Staff with disabilities	83.0%	62th	83th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 50.0 of 60.0 FTE.
Equity index	24.3	44th	38th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	50.2%	9th	10th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 11.5% of income; Part B varied by 14.9% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (7,285) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Vocational services	726	726	100.0%
Peer counseling	560	560	100.0%
Transportation	471	471	100.0%
IL skills training	179	179	100.0%
Assistive technology	73	73	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	69	69	100.0%
Youth transition	37	37	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	33	33	100.0%
Other services	31	31	100.0%
Counseling and related services	7	7	100.0%
Family services	6	6	100.0%
Communication services	3	3	100.0%
Personal assistance	3	3	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	1	1	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	1	1	100.0%
All services	2,201	2,201	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 33 of 33 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 73 of 73 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 69 of 69 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 179 of 179 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 560 of 560 requests filled (100.0%).
Transportation: 471 of 471 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	350	321	21
Communication	9	2	7
Mobility and transportation	41	12	21
Community-based living	66	19	31
Educational	39	4	20
Vocational	474	362	81
Self-care	233	160	53
Information access and technology	167	146	12
Personal resource management	430	335	68
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	5	0	2
Community and social participation	28	3	18
Other	16	5	6

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	466
20 to 24	112
25 to 59	302
60 and older	144
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	484
Mental or emotional	50
Physical	153
Hearing	13
Vision	31
Multiple disabilities	186
Other	107

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with South Carolina residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 2 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	439	43.0%	64.1%	0.67
Black or African American	473	46.3%	25.9%	1.78
American Indian or Alaska Native	6	0.6%	0.4%	1.46
Asian	17	1.7%	1.0%	1.73
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.1%	0.0%	2.17
Two or more races	13	1.3%	4.5%	0.28
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	73	7.1%	4.1%	1.75

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.