Tri - State Resource & Advocacy Corp.

What the center reported

351Consumers served95 carried over, 256 new
181Information and referral contacts
$379,674Total income
$0Part B
$183,539Part C
398Goals achievedof 532 set
47Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$183,539
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$98,217
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$97,918
Total income	$379,674

Eight years of reports

Tri - State Resource & Advocacy Corp. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	417	$235,829	$0	$137,705	11
2017	409	$233,869	$0	$136,729	15
2018	414	$244,116	$0	$154,804	17
2019	264	$200,812	$0	$159,841	23
2020	297	$223,013	$0	$159,841	27
2021	321	$369,187	$0	$159,903	34
2022	343	$286,371	$0	$164,785	43
2023	351	$379,674	$0	$183,539	47

Consumers served, by year

2016417
2017409
2018414
2019264
2020297
2021321
2022343
2023351

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,082	88th	72th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$954	91th	82th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	74.8%	82th	78th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	94.4%	91th	91th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	13.39	93th	88th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	25.61	93th	95th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	82.5%	17th	17th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	89th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 3 of 3 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	76th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 3.0 of 3.0 FTE.
Equity index	24.0	46th	52th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	23.4%	39th	40th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 48.3% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (181) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	239	183	76.6%
Peer counseling	195	195	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	68	43	63.2%
IL skills training	48	45	93.8%
Transportation	34	20	58.8%
Assistive technology	22	15	68.2%
Youth transition	21	18	85.7%
Preventive services	18	14	77.8%
Mobility training	10	8	80.0%
Counseling and related services	7	7	100.0%
Family services	5	2	40.0%
Recreational services	5	5	100.0%
Mental restoration	4	3	75.0%
Therapeutic treatment	4	3	75.0%
Children's services	3	3	100.0%
Communication services	2	1	50.0%
Vocational services	2	2	100.0%
All services	687	567	82.5%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Transportation: 20 of 34 requests filled (58.8%).
Housing and home modifications: 43 of 68 requests filled (63.2%).
Assistive technology: 15 of 22 requests filled (68.2%).
Advocacy and legal services: 183 of 239 requests filled (76.6%).
Preventive services: 14 of 18 requests filled (77.8%).
Mobility training: 8 of 10 requests filled (80.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	239	183	56
Communication	2	1	1
Mobility and transportation	44	27	17
Community-based living	105	77	28
Educational	39	34	5
Vocational	2	2	0
Self-care	5	5	0
Information access and technology	22	15	7
Personal resource management	11	7	4
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	63	47	16

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	2
5 to 19	8
20 to 24	17
25 to 59	173
60 and older	147
Age unavailable	4

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	25
Mental or emotional	42
Physical	102
Hearing	8
Vision	14
Multiple disabilities	160
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Tennessee residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 1 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	205	58.6%	76.0%	0.77
Black or African American	132	37.7%	14.5%	2.60
American Indian or Alaska Native	3	0.9%	0.3%	2.92
Asian	4	1.1%	0.9%	1.21
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	4	1.1%	4.7%	0.25
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	2	0.6%	3.6%	0.16

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.