East Texas Center for Independent Living

What the center reported

420Consumers served228 carried over, 192 new
1,341Information and referral contacts
$766,220Total income
$0Part B
$367,204Part C
275Goals achievedof 750 set
57Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$367,204
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$70,917
State government funds	$197,131
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$130,968
Total income	$766,220

Eight years of reports

East Texas Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	791	$1,574,385	$0	$347,164	157
2017	760	$1,609,860	$0	$269,035	196
2018	932	$1,308,315	$0	$306,488	25
2019	969	$1,204,510	$0	$318,376	126
2020	688	$1,538,850	$0	$318,990	81
2021	541	$1,314,854	$0	$320,869	43
2022	329	$1,340,702	$0	$332,023	25
2023	420	$766,220	$0	$367,204	57

Consumers served, by year

2016791
2017760
2018932
2019969
2020688
2021541
2022329
2023420

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,824	75th	72th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$2,786	72th	70th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	36.7%	34th	36th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	40.9%	31th	27th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	13.57	94th	95th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	15.52	88th	93th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	95.7%	37th	35th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	60.0%	20th	21th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 3 of 5 members.
Staff with disabilities	67.0%	30th	25th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 6.0 of 9.0 FTE.
Equity index	35.5	23th	24th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	19.1%	53th	44th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 47.9% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,341) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	101	99	98.0%
IL skills training	56	52	92.9%
Other services	50	50	100.0%
Peer counseling	38	38	100.0%
Counseling and related services	22	21	95.5%
Recreational services	19	19	100.0%
Communication services	11	11	100.0%
Youth transition	11	6	54.5%
Vocational services	8	8	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	4	2	50.0%
Assistive technology	2	2	100.0%
Transportation	2	2	100.0%
Mobility training	1	1	100.0%
All services	325	311	95.7%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Youth transition: 6 of 11 requests filled (54.5%).
IL skills training: 52 of 56 requests filled (92.9%).
Counseling and related services: 21 of 22 requests filled (95.5%).
Advocacy and legal services: 99 of 101 requests filled (98.0%).
Communication services: 11 of 11 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 38 of 38 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	195	84	68
Communication	25	6	17
Mobility and transportation	9	0	9
Community-based living	133	65	25
Educational	27	6	20
Vocational	8	2	6
Self-care	112	24	87
Information access and technology	4	0	4
Personal resource management	98	20	78
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	110	57	10
Community and social participation	24	9	14
Other	5	2	2

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	34
20 to 24	27
25 to 59	188
60 and older	171
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	44
Mental or emotional	125
Physical	137
Hearing	6
Vision	3
Multiple disabilities	86
Other	19

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Texas residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 25 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	258	65.3%	45.8%	1.43
Black or African American	106	26.8%	10.8%	2.47
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.3%	0.6%	0.43
Asian	1	0.3%	2.3%	0.11
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	2	0.5%	13.7%	0.04
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	27	6.8%	26.7%	0.26

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.