Society's Assets, Inc

What the center reported

330Consumers served72 carried over, 258 new
1,838Information and referral contacts
$6,814,109Total income
$25,725Part B
$35,300Part C
304Goals achievedof 466 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$25,725
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$35,300
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$337,880
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$6,415,204
Total income	$6,814,109

Eight years of reports

Society's Assets, Inc by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	219	$11,201,826	$22,096	$28,601	2
2017	301	$9,617,005	$28,810	$27,213	4
2018	1,989	$8,855,614	$23,866	$30,603	0
2019	344	$7,891,086	$27,446	$31,385	11
2020	469	$6,965,492	$48,547	$31,385	3
2021	486	$6,915,676	$48,547	$31,329	3
2022	295	$6,555,857	$25,725	$31,755	2
2023	330	$6,814,109	$25,725	$35,300	1

Consumers served, by year

2016219
2017301
20181,989
2019344
2020469
2021486
2022295
2023330

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$20,649	4th	14th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$22,415	14th	29th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	65.2%	69th	68th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	84.2%	73th	81th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.30	33th	35th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.83	63th	55th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	78th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	44th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	62.0%	23th	42th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 28.0 of 45.0 FTE.
Equity index	15.0	73th	67th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	19.2%	52th	60th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 0.9% of income; Part B varied by 32.3% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,838) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	122	122	100.0%
Vocational services	85	85	100.0%
Assistive technology	69	69	100.0%
Other services	52	52	100.0%
IL skills training	41	41	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	35	35	100.0%
Peer counseling	28	28	100.0%
Recreational services	13	13	100.0%
Transportation	12	12	100.0%
Preventive services	9	9	100.0%
Communication services	5	5	100.0%
Family services	2	2	100.0%
Personal assistance	2	2	100.0%
All services	475	475	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 35 of 35 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 69 of 69 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 122 of 122 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 41 of 41 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 28 of 28 requests filled (100.0%).
Recreational services: 13 of 13 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	11	6	5
Communication	6	3	3
Mobility and transportation	11	3	8
Community-based living	21	15	6
Educational	18	9	9
Vocational	81	61	20
Self-care	15	7	8
Information access and technology	180	125	55
Personal resource management	96	64	32
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	5	1	4
Community and social participation	16	7	9
Other	6	3	3

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	4
5 to 19	45
20 to 24	23
25 to 59	144
60 and older	114
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	53
Mental or emotional	73
Physical	165
Hearing	18
Vision	15
Multiple disabilities	4
Other	2

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Wisconsin residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	230	69.7%	80.0%	0.87
Black or African American	64	19.4%	6.9%	2.82
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.3%	1.0%	0.30
Asian	2	0.6%	1.5%	0.41
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	7	2.1%	5.1%	0.41
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	26	7.9%	5.4%	1.46

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.