Service Center for Indpendent Life

What the center reported

1,092Consumers served828 carried over, 264 new
1,780Information and referral contacts
$1,655,860Total income
$43,942Part B
$122,844Part C
169Goals achievedof 436 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$43,942
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$122,844
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$537,229
State government funds	$426,149
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$525,696
Total income	$1,655,860

Eight years of reports

Service Center for Indpendent Life by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	222	$655,381	$0	$96,486	2
2017	190	$726,087	$0	$96,519	0
2018	315	$771,002	$0	$108,694	5
2019	281	$920,007	$0	$111,959	0
2020	230	$1,017,468	$0	$111,959	1
2021	316	$990,892	$0	$111,760	0
2022	287	$1,140,682	$0	$113,081	0
2023	1,092	$1,655,860	$43,942	$122,844	0

Consumers served, by year

2016222
2017190
2018315
2019281
2020230
2021316
2022287
20231,092

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,516	82th	86th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$9,798	33th	27th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	38.8%	36th	32th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	32.9%	25th	24th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	11th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	11th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	97.4%	40th	37th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	56.0%	9th	11th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	69.0%	35th	41th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 9.0 of 13.0 FTE.
Equity index	22.3	50th	43th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	30.1%	27th	30th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	1	5th	8th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 10.1% of income; Part B varied by 264.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,780) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	260	260	100.0%
Preventive services	258	242	93.8%
Peer counseling	201	201	100.0%
Youth transition	149	149	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	146	146	100.0%
Assistive technology	115	104	90.4%
Recreational services	68	68	100.0%
Other services	46	44	95.7%
Communication services	31	30	96.8%
Vocational services	17	17	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	15	9	60.0%
Personal assistance	5	5	100.0%
Physical restoration	4	4	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	3	3	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
Family services	1	1	100.0%
Transportation	1	1	100.0%
Mobility training	0	1	—
All services	1,321	1,286	97.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 9 of 15 requests filled (60.0%).
Assistive technology: 104 of 115 requests filled (90.4%).
Preventive services: 242 of 258 requests filled (93.8%).
Other services: 44 of 46 requests filled (95.7%).
Communication services: 30 of 31 requests filled (96.8%).
IL skills training: 260 of 260 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	7	0	7
Communication	14	4	10
Mobility and transportation	5	1	4
Community-based living	105	23	71
Educational	64	42	16
Vocational	20	2	14
Self-care	20	2	18
Information access and technology	115	67	48
Personal resource management	22	2	20
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	2	0	2
Community and social participation	16	2	11
Other	46	24	22

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	24
5 to 19	74
20 to 24	75
25 to 59	494
60 and older	415
Age unavailable	10

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	202
Mental or emotional	236
Physical	259
Hearing	17
Vision	52
Multiple disabilities	70
Other	256

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with California residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 84 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	336	33.3%	42.3%	0.79
Black or African American	122	12.1%	6.4%	1.90
American Indian or Alaska Native	12	1.2%	1.2%	0.99
Asian	86	8.5%	10.2%	0.84
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.2%	0.4%	0.56
Two or more races	5	0.5%	11.9%	0.04
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	445	44.1%	27.6%	1.60

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

More received a service than requested it. For at least one service type, the count receiving exceeds the count requesting.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.