Center for Independent Living of Broward

What the center reported

566Consumers served146 carried over, 420 new
11,443Information and referral contacts
$2,967,944Total income
$56,205Part B
$283,488Part C
969Goals achievedof 1,317 set
57Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$56,205
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$283,488
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$1,330,207
State government funds	$77,333
Local government funds	$746,188
Private and other	$474,523
Total income	$2,967,944

Eight years of reports

Center for Independent Living of Broward by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	309	$616,960	$50,401	$205,644	1
2017	356	$653,892	$46,361	$207,790	1
2018	300	$737,946	$50,545	$237,302	2
2019	393	$900,975	$269,111	$247,036	2
2020	415	$972,609	$52,761	$247,750	3
2021	463	$1,145,410	$52,912	$248,749	3
2022	661	$1,355,046	$51,330	$257,222	13
2023	566	$2,967,944	$56,205	$283,488	57

Consumers served, by year

2016309
2017356
2018300
2019393
2020415
2021463
2022661
2023566

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$5,244	24th	58th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$3,063	70th	94th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	73.6%	80th	84th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	87.4%	79th	87th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	10.07	91th	94th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	20.11	91th	90th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	99.4%	50th	51th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	71.0%	48th	59th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	58.0%	17th	28th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 7.5 of 13.0 FTE.
Equity index	11.2	85th	78th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	61.5%	5th	4th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 11.4% of income; Part B varied by 91.5% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (11,443) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Assistive technology	303	303	100.0%
Peer counseling	239	239	100.0%
IL skills training	222	222	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	146	143	97.9%
Youth transition	140	140	100.0%
Preventive services	118	117	99.2%
Vocational services	94	93	98.9%
Advocacy and legal services	82	81	98.8%
Other services	67	66	98.5%
Transportation	25	25	100.0%
Counseling and related services	8	6	75.0%
Personal assistance	8	8	100.0%
Communication services	6	6	100.0%
Mobility training	4	4	100.0%
Family services	3	3	100.0%
Physical restoration	3	3	100.0%
Recreational services	3	3	100.0%
All services	1,471	1,462	99.4%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Housing and home modifications: 143 of 146 requests filled (97.9%).
Other services: 66 of 67 requests filled (98.5%).
Advocacy and legal services: 81 of 82 requests filled (98.8%).
Vocational services: 93 of 94 requests filled (98.9%).
Preventive services: 117 of 118 requests filled (99.2%).
Assistive technology: 303 of 303 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	75	56	14
Communication	3	0	3
Mobility and transportation	95	64	18
Community-based living	149	94	32
Educational	117	81	18
Vocational	152	123	17
Self-care	87	48	32
Information access and technology	324	285	27
Personal resource management	228	154	44
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	58	57	0
Community and social participation	29	7	15

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	2
5 to 19	73
20 to 24	61
25 to 59	205
60 and older	225
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	104
Mental or emotional	82
Physical	273
Hearing	7
Vision	17
Multiple disabilities	31
Other	52

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Florida residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 42 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	314	59.9%	57.4%	1.04
Black or African American	84	16.0%	11.7%	1.37
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.2%	0.3%	0.65
Asian	8	1.5%	1.6%	0.94
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	0	0.0%	10.9%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	117	22.3%	18.0%	1.24

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.