What the center reported

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
SourceAmount
Title VII Part B (through the state)$73,385
Title VII Part C (direct federal)$192,871
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)$0
Other federal funds$290,350
State government funds$82,154
Local government funds$0
Private and other$1,978
Total income$640,737

Eight years of reports

NWGA Center for Independent Living, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report yearConsumers servedTotal incomePart BPart CMoved out of institutions
2016122$431,162$76,372$143,2265
201790$364,026$76,372$143,6756
2018128$376,014$76,372$162,87415
2019142$373,372$76,372$168,47212
202095$404,756$71,590$168,4728
2021177$528,152$104,116$168,73210
2022410$744,322$96,965$173,93114
2023319$640,737$73,385$192,8717

Consumers served, by year

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
MeasureValueNational percentileSize-peer percentileWhat it is
Income per consumer$2,00970th66thTotal income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved$2,17977th74thTotal income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate79.2%85th88thGoals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met94.4%91th90thShare of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers2.1970th63thRelocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C3.6366th67thThe same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate82.3%16th18thConsumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities80.0%67th69thThe regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 10 members.
Staff with disabilities100.0%90th89thShare of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.0 of 10.0 FTE.
Equity index18.161th65thIndex of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility27.6%31th24thCoefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags054th53thFailed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 41.6% of income; Part B varied by 13.9% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (797) and is not in this table.
ServiceRequestedReceivedFill rate
Peer counseling21518083.7%
Preventive services15313588.2%
IL skills training15113388.1%
Assistive technology977072.2%
Advocacy and legal services402255.0%
Housing and home modifications382976.3%
Youth transition141392.9%
Personal assistance77100.0%
Family services3266.7%
Communication services11100.0%
Counseling and related services11100.0%
Recreational services100.0%
Vocational services11100.0%
All services72259482.3%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal categorySetAchievedIn progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment321
Communication330
Mobility and transportation634617
Community-based living22166
Educational15313518
Vocational220
Self-care846420
Information access and technology972
Personal resource management1376
Relocation from a nursing home or institution1477
Community and social participation550

Who the center served

Consumers by age
AgeConsumers
Under 50
5 to 195
20 to 2415
25 to 59172
60 and older127
Age unavailable0
Consumers by disability type
DisabilityConsumers
Cognitive12
Mental or emotional49
Physical133
Hearing2
Vision3
Multiple disabilities58
Other62

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Georgia residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 2 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
GroupConsumersShare of consumersShare of state disability populationRatio
White22871.9%54.4%1.32
Black or African American6821.5%31.5%0.68
American Indian or Alaska Native30.9%0.3%2.72
Asian10.3%2.2%0.15
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00.0%0.1%0.00
Two or more races10.3%5.5%0.06
Hispanic or Latino (any race)165.0%6.1%0.83

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.