New Orleans Resources for Independent Living, Inc

What the center reported

230Consumers served147 carried over, 83 new
1,009Information and referral contacts
$178,131Total income
$0Part B
$173,305Part C
601Goals achievedof 630 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$173,305
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$4,444
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$382
Total income	$178,131

Eight years of reports

New Orleans Resources for Independent Living, Inc by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	153	$166,658	$0	$138,408	0
2017	123	$155,195	$0	$137,695	1
2018	168	$168,390	$0	$155,376	2
2019	182	$194,521	$0	$158,797	4
2020	182	$247,725	$0	$158,797	0
2021	199	$250,253	$0	$158,515	0
2022	214	$178,989	$0	$160,389	1
2023	230	$178,131	$0	$173,305	2

Consumers served, by year

2016153
2017123
2018168
2019182
2020182
2021199
2022214
2023230

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 1 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$774	94th	85th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$296	99th	97th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	95.4%	97th	97th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	97.4%	96th	96th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.87	51th	49th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.15	46th	59th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	99.5%	51th	51th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	89th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	76th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.0 of 10.0 FTE.
Equity index	22.3	50th	57th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	17.8%	59th	52th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 97.3% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,009) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	149	149	100.0%
Recreational services	115	115	100.0%
Preventive services	81	81	100.0%
IL skills training	64	64	100.0%
Counseling and related services	62	62	100.0%
Physical restoration	58	54	93.1%
Transportation	58	58	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	53	53	100.0%
Peer counseling	53	53	100.0%
Assistive technology	43	43	100.0%
Personal assistance	38	38	100.0%
Youth transition	20	20	100.0%
Vocational services	18	18	100.0%
Mental restoration	14	14	100.0%
Children's services	10	10	100.0%
Communication services	6	6	100.0%
Family services	6	6	100.0%
Mobility training	2	2	100.0%
Therapeutic treatment	2	2	100.0%
All services	852	848	99.5%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Physical restoration: 54 of 58 requests filled (93.1%).
Advocacy and legal services: 149 of 149 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 43 of 43 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 10 of 10 requests filled (100.0%).
Counseling and related services: 62 of 62 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 53 of 53 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	89	89	0
Communication	6	6	0
Mobility and transportation	58	43	15
Community-based living	21	13	7
Educational	6	4	2
Vocational	18	18	0
Self-care	114	114	0
Information access and technology	162	162	0
Personal resource management	38	35	0
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	3	2	0
Community and social participation	115	115	0

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	10
20 to 24	17
25 to 59	99
60 and older	104
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	33
Mental or emotional	46
Physical	92
Hearing	6
Vision	5
Multiple disabilities	48
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Louisiana residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	100	43.5%	58.0%	0.75
Black or African American	121	52.6%	30.3%	1.73
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.6%	0.00
Asian	2	0.9%	0.9%	0.95
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	6	2.6%	5.5%	0.47
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	1	0.4%	4.5%	0.10

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.