Living Independently for Today and Tomorrow

What the center reported

798Consumers served263 carried over, 535 new
4,213Information and referral contacts
$1,981,434Total income
$152,929Part B
$130,035Part C
1,824Goals achievedof 2,416 set
139Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$152,929
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$130,035
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$63,648
State government funds	$187,855
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$1,446,968
Total income	$1,981,434

Eight years of reports

Living Independently for Today and Tomorrow by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	328	$1,854,546	$130,125	$99,724	2
2017	360	$1,971,006	$130,125	$99,724	0
2018	245	$2,035,657	$137,466	$112,459	1
2019	265	$2,055,000	$158,457	$115,643	95
2020	348	$2,152,750	$154,731	$115,643	124
2021	451	$2,623,810	$151,683	$115,643	142
2022	681	$3,433,190	$156,962	$118,191	160
2023	798	$1,981,434	$152,929	$130,035	139

Consumers served, by year

2016328
2017360
2018245
2019265
2020348
2021451
2022681
2023798

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,483	56th	59th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,086	90th	88th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	75.5%	83th	78th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	74.2%	60th	51th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	17.42	96th	94th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	106.89	100th	99th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	72.7%	12th	10th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	93th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 6 members.
Staff with disabilities	100.0%	90th	98th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 32.0 of 32.0 FTE.
Equity index	5.5	97th	96th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	21.7%	44th	48th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 14.3% of income; Part B varied by 7.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (4,213) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	558	341	61.1%
Preventive services	454	403	88.8%
Other services	398	277	69.6%
IL skills training	335	281	83.9%
Advocacy and legal services	292	194	66.4%
Housing and home modifications	216	129	59.7%
Personal assistance	173	163	94.2%
Communication services	171	131	76.6%
Vocational services	65	32	49.2%
Counseling and related services	29	22	75.9%
Assistive technology	22	10	45.5%
Transportation	18	10	55.6%
Family services	8	4	50.0%
Youth transition	5	1	20.0%
Rehabilitation technology	4	2	50.0%
Children's services	3	3	100.0%
Physical restoration	3	1	33.3%
Prostheses and orthotics	3	0	0.0%
Mobility training	2	1	50.0%
Therapeutic treatment	1	1	100.0%
All services	2,760	2,006	72.7%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Assistive technology: 10 of 22 requests filled (45.5%).
Vocational services: 32 of 65 requests filled (49.2%).
Transportation: 10 of 18 requests filled (55.6%).
Housing and home modifications: 129 of 216 requests filled (59.7%).
Peer counseling: 341 of 558 requests filled (61.1%).
Advocacy and legal services: 194 of 292 requests filled (66.4%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	668	453	132
Communication	288	206	35
Mobility and transportation	25	9	10
Community-based living	79	24	33
Educational	20	8	5
Vocational	66	32	19
Self-care	615	572	24
Information access and technology	19	10	3
Personal resource management	351	240	48
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	143	139	3
Community and social participation	18	10	6
Other	124	121	1

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	3
5 to 19	58
20 to 24	64
25 to 59	371
60 and older	302
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	17
Mental or emotional	60
Physical	80
Hearing	2
Vision	4
Multiple disabilities	621
Other	14

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Montana residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 13 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	633	80.6%	83.6%	0.96
Black or African American	8	1.0%	0.4%	2.49
American Indian or Alaska Native	65	8.3%	6.2%	1.34
Asian	4	0.5%	0.6%	0.92
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	3	0.4%	0.0%	9.28
Two or more races	27	3.4%	5.9%	0.58
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	45	5.7%	3.3%	1.76

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.