Granite State Independent Living

What the center reported

454Consumers served296 carried over, 158 new
5Information and referral contacts
$1,678,529Total income
$7,771Part B
$63,232Part C
926Goals achievedof 1,819 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$7,771
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$63,232
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$218,209
State government funds	$126,986
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$1,262,331
Total income	$1,678,529

Eight years of reports

Granite State Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	151	$2,660,790	$29,639	$48,493	1
2017	243	$1,164,250	$12,541	$48,493	1
2018	301	$1,072,692	$10,568	$54,686	0
2019	411	$1,070,057	$8,346	$56,234	2
2020	456	$1,059,516	$10,105	$56,234	0
2021	423	$1,127,913	$8,396	$56,234	0
2022	422	$1,352,444	$8,273	$56,234	4
2023	454	$1,678,529	$7,771	$63,232	0

Consumers served, by year

2016151
2017243
2018301
2019411
2020456
2021423
2022422
2023454

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,697	42th	35th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,813	82th	79th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	50.9%	50th	49th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	1.4%	5th	4th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	11th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	11th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	67.0%	37th	40th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 8 of 12 members.
Staff with disabilities	68.0%	33th	39th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 59.0 of 87.0 FTE.
Equity index	18.6	60th	53th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	36.9%	16th	16th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 4.2% of income; Part B varied by 57.3% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (5) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
IL skills training	484	484	100.0%
Personal assistance	125	125	100.0%
Communication services	110	110	100.0%
Youth transition	88	88	100.0%
Peer counseling	11	11	100.0%
Transportation	10	10	100.0%
Assistive technology	6	6	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	2	2	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	2	2	100.0%
Recreational services	2	2	100.0%
Other services	1	1	100.0%
All services	841	841	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Communication services: 110 of 110 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 484 of 484 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 11 of 11 requests filled (100.0%).
Personal assistance: 125 of 125 requests filled (100.0%).
Transportation: 10 of 10 requests filled (100.0%).
Youth transition: 88 of 88 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	219	132	67
Communication	141	96	33
Mobility and transportation	65	24	35
Community-based living	302	131	120
Educational	309	157	70
Vocational	176	92	38
Self-care	183	88	93
Information access and technology	228	106	73
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	1	0	1
Community and social participation	138	92	32
Other	57	8	5

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	11
5 to 19	241
20 to 24	27
25 to 59	75
60 and older	100
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	121
Mental or emotional	108
Physical	180
Hearing	25
Vision	5
Multiple disabilities	0
Other	15

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New Hampshire residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 9 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	335	75.3%	89.5%	0.84
Black or African American	30	6.7%	1.2%	5.70
American Indian or Alaska Native	5	1.1%	0.2%	5.05
Asian	9	2.0%	1.3%	1.51
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.2%	0.1%	3.88
Two or more races	0	0.0%	4.3%	0.00
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	65	14.6%	3.4%	4.34

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.