Community Resources for Independence

What the center reported

387Consumers served311 carried over, 76 new
855Information and referral contacts
$15,271,490Total income
$5,440Part B
$266,164Part C
153Goals achievedof 620 set
1Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$5,440
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$266,164
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$445,627
State government funds	$1,396,795
Local government funds	$13,143,325
Private and other	$14,139
Total income	$15,271,490

Eight years of reports

Community Resources for Independence by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	649	$18,404,441	$0	$208,518	11
2017	658	$21,356,557	$0	$207,012	5
2018	605	$20,822,616	$0	$232,168	1
2019	523	$18,967,614	$0	$237,803	1
2020	452	$16,139,630	$0	$237,803	1
2021	509	$15,772,879	$0	$237,380	2
2022	461	$20,240,645	$0	$240,186	2
2023	387	$15,271,490	$5,440	$266,164	1

Consumers served, by year

2016649
2017658
2018605
2019523
2020452
2021509
2022461
2023387

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 4 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$39,461	0th	1th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$99,814	3th	7th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	24.7%	20th	20th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	8.5%	10th	12th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.26	32th	32th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.38	29th	22th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	77.9%	13th	17th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	56.0%	9th	13th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	56.0%	12th	19th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 9.0 of 16.0 FTE.
Equity index	19.0	59th	57th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	12.2%	80th	79th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	54th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 1.8% of income; Part B varied by 264.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (855) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Transportation	610	530	86.9%
Advocacy and legal services	290	183	63.1%
Recreational services	276	211	76.4%
Peer counseling	189	162	85.7%
Other services	168	141	83.9%
IL skills training	135	90	66.7%
Assistive technology	58	31	53.4%
Communication services	23	15	65.2%
Therapeutic treatment	14	14	100.0%
Vocational services	8	4	50.0%
Counseling and related services	4	2	50.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	4	4	100.0%
Family services	2	0	0.0%
Housing and home modifications	2	1	50.0%
Physical restoration	2	2	100.0%
Youth transition	2	2	100.0%
All services	1,787	1,392	77.9%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Assistive technology: 31 of 58 requests filled (53.4%).
Advocacy and legal services: 183 of 290 requests filled (63.1%).
Communication services: 15 of 23 requests filled (65.2%).
IL skills training: 90 of 135 requests filled (66.7%).
Recreational services: 211 of 276 requests filled (76.4%).
Other services: 141 of 168 requests filled (83.9%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	105	36	60
Communication	6	2	4
Mobility and transportation	67	19	42
Community-based living	98	16	68
Educational	1	1	0
Vocational	2	0	2
Self-care	197	36	127
Information access and technology	20	2	17
Personal resource management	6	2	3
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	4	1	2
Community and social participation	93	32	58
Other	21	6	15

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	4
5 to 19	3
20 to 24	9
25 to 59	119
60 and older	252
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	22
Mental or emotional	28
Physical	149
Hearing	2
Vision	4
Multiple disabilities	136
Other	46

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Pennsylvania residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 72 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	287	91.1%	72.1%	1.26
Black or African American	24	7.6%	12.1%	0.63
American Indian or Alaska Native	0	0.0%	0.2%	0.00
Asian	1	0.3%	2.0%	0.16
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	1	0.3%	5.3%	0.06
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	2	0.6%	8.3%	0.08

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.