Endependence Center, Incorporated

What the center reported

760Consumers served491 carried over, 269 new
2,972Information and referral contacts
$2,114,816Total income
$26,000Part B
$452,636Part C
291Goals achievedof 916 set
9Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$26,000
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$452,636
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$306,812
State government funds	$620,566
Local government funds	$95,512
Private and other	$613,290
Total income	$2,114,816

Eight years of reports

Endependence Center, Incorporated by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	2,282	$2,106,710	$21,117	$346,360	57
2017	2,388	$2,128,021	$23,500	$345,789	40
2018	1,098	$2,014,487	$25,642	$389,698	30
2019	853	$2,287,793	$25,642	$401,250	4
2020	819	$2,242,953	$26,000	$401,250	0
2021	906	$2,054,207	$26,000	$400,537	1
2022	820	$2,066,111	$26,000	$409,138	1
2023	760	$2,114,816	$26,000	$452,636	9

Consumers served, by year

20162,282
20172,388
20181,098
2019853
2020819
2021906
2022820
2023760

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,783	53th	49th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$7,267	41th	34th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	31.8%	28th	21th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	37.9%	29th	27th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.18	58th	61th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.99	56th	49th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	86.0%	77th	75th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	83.0%	62th	72th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 19.0 of 23.0 FTE.
Equity index	33.5	27th	25th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	4.1%	99th	99th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 22.6% of income; Part B varied by 6.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (2,972) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Other services	897	897	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	221	221	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	208	208	100.0%
Peer counseling	112	112	100.0%
IL skills training	56	56	100.0%
Preventive services	45	45	100.0%
Vocational services	42	42	100.0%
Transportation	40	40	100.0%
Youth transition	33	33	100.0%
Communication services	4	4	100.0%
Recreational services	4	4	100.0%
Assistive technology	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,663	1,663	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 221 of 221 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 208 of 208 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 56 of 56 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 112 of 112 requests filled (100.0%).
Preventive services: 45 of 45 requests filled (100.0%).
Transportation: 40 of 40 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	136	22	114
Communication	4	0	4
Mobility and transportation	61	15	46
Community-based living	165	55	110
Educational	38	10	28
Vocational	174	116	58
Self-care	6	0	6
Information access and technology	4	2	2
Personal resource management	283	61	222
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	29	9	20
Community and social participation	12	1	11
Other	4	0	4

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	53
20 to 24	92
25 to 59	437
60 and older	178
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	211
Mental or emotional	29
Physical	118
Hearing	46
Vision	3
Multiple disabilities	331
Other	22

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Virginia residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 7 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	285	37.8%	63.1%	0.60
Black or African American	405	53.8%	20.3%	2.65
American Indian or Alaska Native	3	0.4%	0.4%	1.11
Asian	15	2.0%	3.8%	0.53
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	26	3.5%	5.9%	0.58
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	19	2.5%	6.5%	0.39

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.