West Central Illinois Center for Independent Living

What the center reported

165Consumers served114 carried over, 51 new
518Information and referral contacts
$649,269Total income
$28,456Part B
$171,843Part C
25Goals achievedof 208 set
2Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$28,456
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$171,843
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$139,657
State government funds	$172,294
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$137,019
Total income	$649,269

Eight years of reports

West Central Illinois Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	178	$444,212	$5,070	$138,739	2
2017	175	$428,608	$7,745	$137,353	1
2018	167	$425,220	$7,816	$153,563	4
2019	239	$546,404	$24,567	$157,034	5
2020	254	$539,025	$48,300	$157,034	2
2021	211	$574,976	$61,639	$156,755	4
2022	226	$549,687	$57,773	$158,608	0
2023	165	$649,269	$28,456	$171,843	2

Consumers served, by year

2016178
2017175
2018167
2019239
2020254
2021211
2022226
2023165

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,935	37th	29th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$25,971	12th	10th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	12.0%	10th	12th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	27.8%	21th	18th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	1.21	60th	53th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	1.16	47th	48th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	76th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	71.0%	48th	51th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 5 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	71.0%	38th	32th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 5.0 of 7.0 FTE.
Equity index	23.9	46th	52th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	14.4%	72th	68th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 30.8% of income; Part B varied by 71.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (518) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	54	54	100.0%
Personal assistance	51	51	100.0%
Peer counseling	42	42	100.0%
Other services	36	36	100.0%
IL skills training	34	34	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	17	17	100.0%
Children's services	17	17	100.0%
Transportation	10	10	100.0%
Assistive technology	9	9	100.0%
Youth transition	9	9	100.0%
Communication services	1	1	100.0%
All services	280	280	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 17 of 17 requests filled (100.0%).
Children's services: 17 of 17 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 54 of 54 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 34 of 34 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 42 of 42 requests filled (100.0%).
Personal assistance: 51 of 51 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	23	4	19
Mobility and transportation	8	0	8
Community-based living	37	2	35
Educational	25	1	24
Vocational	2	0	2
Self-care	80	14	66
Information access and technology	4	0	4
Personal resource management	15	2	13
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	6	2	4
Community and social participation	2	0	2
Other	6	0	6

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	25
20 to 24	7
25 to 59	82
60 and older	51
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	31
Mental or emotional	30
Physical	86
Hearing	3
Vision	8
Multiple disabilities	6
Other	1

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Illinois residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 0 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	141	85.5%	61.7%	1.39
Black or African American	17	10.3%	16.5%	0.63
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.6%	0.5%	1.33
Asian	0	0.0%	3.4%	0.00
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.0%	0.00
Two or more races	5	3.0%	6.4%	0.47
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	1	0.6%	11.6%	0.05

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.