Southern Indiana Center for Independent Living

What the center reported

234Consumers served93 carried over, 141 new
795Information and referral contacts
$604,421Total income
$284,985Part B
$281,066Part C
585Goals achievedof 953 set
6Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$284,985
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$281,066
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$38,070
State government funds	$0
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$300
Total income	$604,421

Eight years of reports

Southern Indiana Center for Independent Living by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	260	$457,076	$33,293	$215,300	4
2017	334	$1,898,918	$33,292	$215,300	8
2018	354	$1,957,405	$33,293	$242,297	6
2019	402	$2,196,628	$24,339	$228,274	3
2020	477	$340,086	$249,026	$91,060	0
2021	338	$453,615	$199,652	$248,584	6
2022	282	$2,994,195	$72,312	$253,669	12
2023	234	$604,421	$284,985	$281,066	6

Consumers served, by year

2016260
2017334
2018354
2019402
2020477
2021338
2022282
2023234

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 2 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,583	55th	47th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,033	91th	94th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	61.4%	64th	72th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	89.5%	83th	82th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	2.56	73th	69th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	2.13	57th	60th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	60.8%	5th	8th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	78.0%	63th	66th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 9 members.
Staff with disabilities	65.0%	27th	21th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 44.0 of 68.0 FTE.
Equity index	15.1	72th	80th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	69.9%	4th	4th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	53th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 93.7% of income; Part B varied by 88.2% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (795) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Peer counseling	233	159	68.2%
Advocacy and legal services	232	158	68.1%
Housing and home modifications	181	72	39.8%
Assistive technology	86	59	68.6%
Communication services	50	28	56.0%
IL skills training	22	13	59.1%
Transportation	18	9	50.0%
Mobility training	10	5	50.0%
Recreational services	9	7	77.8%
Vocational services	6	3	50.0%
Youth transition	4	4	100.0%
Personal assistance	1	1	100.0%
All services	852	518	60.8%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Housing and home modifications: 72 of 181 requests filled (39.8%).
Mobility training: 5 of 10 requests filled (50.0%).
Transportation: 9 of 18 requests filled (50.0%).
Communication services: 28 of 50 requests filled (56.0%).
IL skills training: 13 of 22 requests filled (59.1%).
Advocacy and legal services: 158 of 232 requests filled (68.1%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	232	159	59
Communication	55	33	15
Mobility and transportation	54	25	21
Community-based living	154	90	35
Educational	5	4	1
Vocational	7	2	2
Self-care	91	50	25
Information access and technology	112	67	28
Personal resource management	224	146	50
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	12	6	5
Community and social participation	7	3	3

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	7
20 to 24	4
25 to 59	83
60 and older	140
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	6
Mental or emotional	8
Physical	46
Hearing	3
Vision	3
Multiple disabilities	167
Other	1

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Indiana residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 6 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	211	92.5%	78.5%	1.18
Black or African American	4	1.8%	9.2%	0.19
American Indian or Alaska Native	1	0.4%	0.3%	1.57
Asian	1	0.4%	1.1%	0.41
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	2	0.9%	0.0%	27.48
Two or more races	4	1.8%	5.5%	0.32
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	5	2.2%	5.5%	0.40

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.