The Capital District Center for Independence, Inc.

What the center reported

427Consumers served104 carried over, 323 new
1,331Information and referral contacts
$1,371,278Total income
$0Part B
$252,435Part C
247Goals achievedof 561 set
21Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
7Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$0
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$252,435
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$84,957
State government funds	$494,848
Local government funds	$0
Private and other	$539,039
Total income	$1,371,278

Eight years of reports

The Capital District Center for Independence, Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	253	$982,336	$0	$191,385	11
2017	316	$900,619	$0	$190,250	3
2018	—	—	—	—	—
2019	737	$834,781	$0	$228,483	13
2020	675	$1,032,470	$0	$228,483	8
2021	841	$1,001,750	$0	$228,077	12
2022	892	$1,078,288	$0	$230,773	7
2023	427	$1,371,278	$0	$252,435	21

Consumers served, by year

2016253
2017316
2018—
2019737
2020675
2021841
2022892
2023427

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$3,211	48th	44th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$5,552	49th	42th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	44.0%	42th	40th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	13.0%	11th	12th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	4.92	82th	83th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	8.32	79th	76th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	93th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 7 of 7 members.
Staff with disabilities	91.0%	75th	90th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 10.5 of 11.5 FTE.
Equity index	17.9	62th	58th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	15.4%	69th	70th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 18.4% of income.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (1,331) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Advocacy and legal services	617	617	100.0%
Vocational services	238	238	100.0%
Youth transition	158	158	100.0%
Peer counseling	142	142	100.0%
Family services	136	136	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	96	96	100.0%
Other services	93	93	100.0%
IL skills training	56	56	100.0%
Transportation	21	21	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	20	20	100.0%
Mobility training	17	17	100.0%
Assistive technology	11	11	100.0%
Communication services	11	11	100.0%
Counseling and related services	8	8	100.0%
Personal assistance	5	5	100.0%
Physical restoration	5	5	100.0%
Mental restoration	4	4	100.0%
Prostheses and orthotics	4	4	100.0%
Preventive services	2	2	100.0%
Recreational services	2	2	100.0%
Children's services	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,647	1,647	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 617 of 617 requests filled (100.0%).
Assistive technology: 11 of 11 requests filled (100.0%).
Communication services: 11 of 11 requests filled (100.0%).
Family services: 136 of 136 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 96 of 96 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 56 of 56 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	65	14	51
Communication	9	6	3
Mobility and transportation	16	14	2
Community-based living	61	23	38
Educational	8	3	5
Vocational	9	0	9
Self-care	10	8	2
Information access and technology	11	10	1
Personal resource management	210	141	69
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	23	21	2
Community and social participation	8	6	2
Other	131	1	130

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	2
5 to 19	138
20 to 24	28
25 to 59	186
60 and older	73
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	112
Mental or emotional	34
Physical	54
Hearing	0
Vision	2
Multiple disabilities	225
Other	0

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with New York residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 81 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	211	61.0%	53.5%	1.14
Black or African American	86	24.9%	15.0%	1.66
American Indian or Alaska Native	3	0.9%	0.6%	1.45
Asian	9	2.6%	5.2%	0.50
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.3%	0.1%	5.27
Two or more races	23	6.6%	7.8%	0.85
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	13	3.8%	17.9%	0.21

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.