Liberty Resources, INC.

What the center reported

628Consumers served545 carried over, 83 new
3,486Information and referral contacts
$1,719,086Total income
$7,650Part B
$228,603Part C
41Goals achievedof 361 set
33Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$7,650
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$228,603
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$26,811
State government funds	$413,816
Local government funds	$460,170
Private and other	$582,036
Total income	$1,719,086

Eight years of reports

Liberty Resources, INC. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	1,005	$5,045,747	$0	$178,767	34
2017	471	$5,388,990	$0	$177,798	24
2018	525	$5,643,862	$0	$199,404	15
2019	531	$5,668,365	$0	$204,244	17
2020	515	$5,817,113	$0	$204,244	30
2021	523	$5,801,737	$0	$203,881	28
2022	654	$1,724,496	$0	$213,795	7
2023	628	$1,719,086	$7,650	$228,603	33

Consumers served, by year

20161,005
2017471
2018525
2019531
2020515
2021523
2022654
2023628

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$2,737	53th	51th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$41,929	8th	6th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	11.4%	9th	9th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	3.0%	7th	5th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	5.25	83th	86th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	14.44	86th	83th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	89.1%	24th	18th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	100.0%	93th	93th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 11 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	52.0%	6th	6th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 23.5 of 45.5 FTE.
Equity index	54.9	8th	6th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	36.5%	17th	17th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 13.7% of income; Part B varied by 264.6% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (3,486) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Housing and home modifications	488	457	93.6%
Youth transition	296	261	88.2%
Other services	293	260	88.7%
Peer counseling	219	198	90.4%
Advocacy and legal services	64	43	67.2%
IL skills training	50	36	72.0%
Personal assistance	45	44	97.8%
Communication services	41	29	70.7%
Recreational services	36	36	100.0%
Family services	24	22	91.7%
Physical restoration	24	24	100.0%
Transportation	17	15	88.2%
Assistive technology	16	13	81.2%
Vocational services	16	13	81.2%
Preventive services	9	9	100.0%
Counseling and related services	6	5	83.3%
Mobility training	3	3	100.0%
Mental restoration	1	1	100.0%
Rehabilitation technology	1	1	100.0%
All services	1,649	1,470	89.1%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 43 of 64 requests filled (67.2%).
Communication services: 29 of 41 requests filled (70.7%).
IL skills training: 36 of 50 requests filled (72.0%).
Assistive technology: 13 of 16 requests filled (81.2%).
Vocational services: 13 of 16 requests filled (81.2%).
Transportation: 15 of 17 requests filled (88.2%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	26	2	23
Communication	3	0	3
Mobility and transportation	3	1	2
Community-based living	60	4	55
Educational	55	0	54
Vocational	28	0	27
Self-care	10	0	8
Information access and technology	1	0	1
Personal resource management	14	0	14
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	130	33	66
Community and social participation	18	0	18
Other	13	1	12

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	0
5 to 19	1
20 to 24	11
25 to 59	316
60 and older	300
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	45
Mental or emotional	35
Physical	351
Hearing	63
Vision	26
Multiple disabilities	48
Other	60

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Pennsylvania residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 11 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	145	23.5%	72.1%	0.33
Black or African American	412	66.8%	12.1%	5.50
American Indian or Alaska Native	2	0.3%	0.2%	1.51
Asian	9	1.5%	2.0%	0.72
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	1	0.2%	0.0%	3.60
Two or more races	9	1.5%	5.3%	0.28
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	39	6.3%	8.3%	0.77

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.