Resources for Independent Living Inc.

What the center reported

818Consumers served637 carried over, 181 new
402Information and referral contacts
$1,304,473Total income
$26,000Part B
$452,637Part C
1,113Goals achievedof 1,550 set
0Moved out of institutionsrelocation goals achieved
8Years reportedof 8 since 2016

Funding sources

Income by source, report year 2023Dollars received, as reported. The report does not show expenditure.
Source	Amount
Title VII Part B (through the state)	$26,000
Title VII Part C (direct federal)	$452,637
Title VII Chapter 2 (older individuals who are blind)	$0
Other federal funds	$0
State government funds	$780,836
Local government funds	$45,000
Private and other	$0
Total income	$1,304,473

Eight years of reports

Resources for Independent Living Inc. by report yearA blank row means no report was found for that year.
Report year	Consumers served	Total income	Part B	Part C	Moved out of institutions
2016	987	$1,114,593	$21,118	$346,361	4
2017	1,036	$1,105,687	$23,500	$345,789	152
2018	1,009	$1,142,482	$25,642	$389,699	2
2019	884	$1,153,586	$25,642	$401,251	0
2020	1,465	$1,028,081	$26,000	$401,251	2
2021	1,489	$1,202,759	$26,000	$400,538	2
2022	822	$1,246,333	$26,000	$409,139	2
2023	818	$1,304,473	$26,000	$452,637	0

Consumers served, by year

2016987
20171,036
20181,009
2019884
20201,465
20211,489
2022822
2023818

Measures against peers

Percentiles place this center among the 349 centers reporting in 2023 (national) and among centers of similar size (size peers: quartile 3 of 4 by total income). 100 is the most favourable position. How each measure is built and what it cannot tell you.

Relative measures, report year 2023
Measure	Value	National percentile	Size-peer percentile	What it is
Income per consumer	$1,595	80th	83th	Total income divided by consumers served. Lower ranks higher. It is intensity, not efficiency: a center doing nursing-home transitions costs more per person than one doing mostly information.
Income per goal achieved	$1,172	89th	87th	Total income divided by goals achieved. Lower ranks higher. Goals are self-reported and are not weighted by difficulty.
Goal achievement rate	71.8%	78th	73th	Goals achieved as a share of goals set. A rate near 100% can mean goals are recorded only when already met.
Records closed with all goals met	40.9%	31th	29th	Share of closed consumer records closed as "completed all goals set". Recorded at exit, so a stronger signal than goal counts.
Transitions per 100 consumers	0.00	11th	11th	Relocation-from-institution goals achieved per 100 consumers. Zero is common at small centers; the percentile shows how common.
Transitions per $100,000 of Part C	0.00	11th	11th	The same count against direct federal funding.
Service fill rate	100.0%	76th	74th	Consumers receiving a service as a share of consumers requesting it, across all service types except information and referral.
Board members with significant disabilities	55.0%	6th	3th	The regulation requires more than 50%. 6 of 11 members.
Staff with disabilities	69.0%	35th	41th	Share of staff full-time equivalents filled by people with disabilities. 9.0 of 13.0 FTE.
Equity index	51.3	9th	8th	Index of dissimilarity between the race and ethnicity of consumers and of the state's disability population, 0 to 100. Lower ranks higher. Compared with the state, not the center's actual service area.
Income volatility	7.0%	96th	96th	Coefficient of variation of total income across the years reported. Lower ranks higher.
Data-quality flags	0	54th	56th	Failed arithmetic checks in this year's report. Fewer ranks higher. Listed below.

Title VII funds (Parts B and C and Chapter 2) were 36.7% of income; Part B varied by 6.7% (coefficient of variation) across the years reported.

Services requested and received

Consumers requesting and receiving each service, report year 2023Information and referral is counted as contacts (402) and is not in this table.
Service	Requested	Received	Fill rate
Other services	1,428	1,428	100.0%
Advocacy and legal services	292	292	100.0%
Youth transition	190	190	100.0%
Housing and home modifications	131	131	100.0%
IL skills training	41	41	100.0%
Vocational services	36	36	100.0%
Preventive services	31	31	100.0%
Peer counseling	30	30	100.0%
Recreational services	29	29	100.0%
Transportation	2	2	100.0%
All services	2,210	2,210	100.0%

Largest unmet demand

Services with ten or more requests, ordered by the share that went unfilled.

Advocacy and legal services: 292 of 292 requests filled (100.0%).
Housing and home modifications: 131 of 131 requests filled (100.0%).
IL skills training: 41 of 41 requests filled (100.0%).
Peer counseling: 30 of 30 requests filled (100.0%).
Preventive services: 31 of 31 requests filled (100.0%).
Recreational services: 29 of 29 requests filled (100.0%).

Goals by category

Goals set, achieved and in progress, report year 2023
Goal category	Set	Achieved	In progress
Self-advocacy and self-empowerment	780	768	12
Communication	4	0	4
Mobility and transportation	202	57	145
Community-based living	186	72	114
Educational	128	54	74
Vocational	40	12	28
Self-care	9	2	7
Information access and technology	3	0	3
Personal resource management	140	116	24
Relocation from a nursing home or institution	1	0	1
Community and social participation	57	32	25

Who the center served

Consumers by age
Age	Consumers
Under 5	2
5 to 19	134
20 to 24	179
25 to 59	263
60 and older	240
Age unavailable	0

Consumers by disability type
Disability	Consumers
Cognitive	363
Mental or emotional	30
Physical	182
Hearing	29
Vision	16
Multiple disabilities	182
Other	16

Race and ethnicity against the state's disability population

Consumers compared with Virginia residents with a disabilityCenter shares exclude 2 consumers of unknown race. State shares are from ACS B18101A to B18101I. A ratio above 1 means the group is a larger share of consumers than of the state's disability population.
Group	Consumers	Share of consumers	Share of state disability population	Ratio
White	181	22.2%	63.1%	0.35
Black or African American	580	71.1%	20.3%	3.50
American Indian or Alaska Native	7	0.9%	0.4%	2.40
Asian	15	1.8%	3.8%	0.49
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	0	0.0%	0.1%	0.00
Two or more races	23	2.8%	5.9%	0.48
Hispanic or Latino (any race)	10	1.2%	6.5%	0.19

Hispanic or Latino is an ethnicity reported alongside race in the PPR, so shares can sum to more than 100%. The comparison is with the whole state, which overstates any mismatch for a center that serves one part of it.

Data quality

Eight arithmetic checks run over every center's report. They test whether the tables agree with each other, nothing more. How often each check fails nationally.

None of the arithmetic checks failed for this report. That means the tables add up, not that the counts are verified.

What this cannot tell you

The report is unaudited self-report. Nobody verifies the consumer counts.
It reports income, not expenditure. A cost measure here is a stand-in until checked against the center's audited financial statements.
Part B and Part C outcomes are not separable. The center reports total activity.
There is no county, city or island detail in the public file.
Percentiles compare centers whose definitions of "consumer" and "goal" may differ. The data-quality row is the only signal of that in the public data.
Relative position is not impact. Nothing here supports a causal claim about what the center changed in anyone's life.

Source: Administration for Community Living, Centers for Independent Living Program Performance Report public datafiles, report years 2016 to 2023. Generated 2026-10-25.